Skip to main content

Deconversion

In voicing the fact that my beliefs have changed from the monotheism of Christianity to atheism, I have been told I am attacking other people's beliefs.  Certainly, I have raised concerns I've had with Mormon doctrine, so I suppose that could be considered an attack.  But, in my opinion, being honest about one's own feelings is a good and commendable thing to do, not something that people should complain about.

Conversion to a religion is a very long process and requires a great deal of effort on the part of the convert, which is why it happens so infrequently.  But converting to atheism (or, more appropriately, irreligionism) is very different.  Yes, it takes a long time and it's an involved process, but for different reasons.  There is no ritual that you need to learn and follow, there are no required meetings to attend on Sunday morning or Wednesday evening.  You don't have to learn a new set of rules and make sure to follow them closely whenever you're around other atheists.  Pretty much the only thing you have to do is figure out how to live your life outside of religion.  This is why I think the word "deconversion" is more appropriate than "conversion", and it's a term I've seen used by many people.

As I've said before, I have no real motivation to change people's religious beliefs.  I have no need to make people think the way I do.  I don't believe anyone's going to hell if they don't agree with me--I don't even believe in hell.  So, why do I share my thoughts and feelings?  I want people to know the truth--of all things.  That's part of the reason why I want to be a professor.  I like teaching, and I like teaching things that are true.  I believe that knowledge is power and that the more things people learn, the better they are equipped to face the challenges that come in their lives.  So, I share things that I believe to be true, and I encourage other people to study things out, think about them, and come to their own conclusions on what is true.

I've watched a lot of YouTube videos of people who have deconverted and are now atheists.  Some of them I have found to include a lot of bitter and spiteful feelings toward Christianity, all religion, or some specific religion.  I don't blame them for this.  They have good reason to feel these feelings, and I hope you can understand what those reasons might be.  I think it's healthy for them to be honest about their feelings and express them.  I don't think that sharing those kinds of videos and feelings with my Christian friends is going to be productive, so I have refrained from doing so.  I did, however, come across one YouTuber that has expressed his experience very matter-of-factly and with respect for those who are Christian.  This is the link to his playlist on his deconversion experience.  The first video in this playlist is embedded below.  This guy, whose handle is Evid3nc3, also has a blog.  I would recommend perusing the blog and also watching his videos.  I want to add that much of my own experience is very much like his, and so reading and understanding his story may help you to understand my own.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do you really believe?

This is Richard Dawkin's talk from yesterday's Reason Rally in Washington DC.  He makes several good points, but the one that stuck out to me the most was when he told people that they should challenge someone when they say they're religious.  The example he gave is when someone says they're Catholic, ask them if they really  believe that when a priest blesses a wafer that it actually turns into the body of Christ, or that the wine actually turns into his blood.  So, this post will be dedicated to me asking any of my reader base who are religious, do you really  believe what your religions teach? For those who are Christian (any denomination thereof), Do you really believe every word of the Bible to be the word of god?  If so, read every word of the Bible and then come back and answer the question again. Do you really believe that a snake tricked Eve into eating fruit that made her suddenly unfit to live in the paradisiacal garden god had just made for her? Do y

Hitchens v god

I'm rather ashamed to admit that I just recently discovered Christopher Hitchens. And, while I normally add my own thoughts and commentary to videos when I post them here, in nearly every Hitchens video that I've encountered, I have not a single word to add. He is so articulate and does such a good job of presenting his case that I couldn't possibly add anything to it.  I would definitely be interested if any of my readers have any comments to make in regards to what Hitches says in this video. Enjoy.  

The fundamental theorem of atheism

I think many times, with all the discussion of religion, science, atheism, etc, it can be easy to lose sight of the real purpose of what one is trying to accomplish.  Of course, this can happen in any discussion.  But, one of those ever-famous text-images found on Facebook caught my attention today.  (I do think it's funny, but from what I have seen a basic fact about human psychology, that people are more likely to read text when it is in an image--even if the image is purely text--than when it is just simply written text.  I wonder if they've done any studies on that.) So, to bring my own focus back to where it should be, here is what I will call the "fundamental theorem of atheism".  Yes, that's a very mathematical title--every branch (and sub-branch) of mathematics has a "fundamental theorem".  So, here it is for atheism.   The burden of proof lies on those who claim that there is a god to produce evidence of its existence .  So, here's the ima