Skip to main content

New Template

So, if you've been reading my blog for a while now, then you know I've kind of tweaked the appearance a little bit.  I really like the new background pic that I added a little while ago.  The one before was really cool too--I love that long black dress coat.  But, I've been keeping a close eye on Blogger's new "dynamic views" and I really like them.  As you can see, I finally caved in and made it the default view for my blog.  I wanted to wait until I could make the text boxes transparent, because I didn't want to obstruct the view of Conrad's beautiful face in the background picture.  So, now that I have discovered how to make the text boxes transparent (or, more accurately, to decrease their opacity), I caved in and changed my template.  I hope you like the new look as much as I do.

Sadly, one of the consequences is that the sidebar, with my blogroll and Facebook link, are all gone.  But, Google assures me that they will have that fixed in the near future, so I look forward to having a sidebar again.

Finally, one of the benefits of this dynamic view is that if you don't like it you can pick a different view from the drop-down list right under the blog title in the top-left corner.  This view is called "Timeline", and there are several others to choose from.  Enjoy.

Comments

  1. Trev11/5/11, 12:19 AM

    Yeah, that background picture is really nice.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brian11/16/11, 4:04 AM

    Hey, just wondering if you can tell me how you built your page -- with the transparencies, and drop-down effects, etc. E-mail me at bbeningt@mymail.slcc.edu.

    Thanks,

    Brian

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Anyone is allowed to comment on this blog. As you can tell from reading my blog, I am very opinionated and I'm not afraid to share my opinion. You're welcome to disagree with me as mildly or vehemently as you like, but be aware that I will reply with my own opinions, very strongly. If you don't want that kind of open discussion, or you think it will hurt your feelings, then please avoid posting. I do try to be respectful, but my verbology often comes across as brusque.

Popular posts from this blog

Do you really believe?

This is Richard Dawkin's talk from yesterday's Reason Rally in Washington DC.  He makes several good points, but the one that stuck out to me the most was when he told people that they should challenge someone when they say they're religious.  The example he gave is when someone says they're Catholic, ask them if they really  believe that when a priest blesses a wafer that it actually turns into the body of Christ, or that the wine actually turns into his blood.  So, this post will be dedicated to me asking any of my reader base who are religious, do you really  believe what your religions teach? For those who are Christian (any denomination thereof), Do you really believe every word of the Bible to be the word of god?  If so, read every word of the Bible and then come back and answer the question again. Do you really believe that a snake tricked Eve into eating fruit that made her suddenly unfit to live in the paradisiacal garden god had just made for her? Do y
30 comments
Read more

Hitchens v god

I'm rather ashamed to admit that I just recently discovered Christopher Hitchens. And, while I normally add my own thoughts and commentary to videos when I post them here, in nearly every Hitchens video that I've encountered, I have not a single word to add. He is so articulate and does such a good job of presenting his case that I couldn't possibly add anything to it.  I would definitely be interested if any of my readers have any comments to make in regards to what Hitches says in this video. Enjoy.  
41 comments
Read more

The fundamental theorem of atheism

I think many times, with all the discussion of religion, science, atheism, etc, it can be easy to lose sight of the real purpose of what one is trying to accomplish.  Of course, this can happen in any discussion.  But, one of those ever-famous text-images found on Facebook caught my attention today.  (I do think it's funny, but from what I have seen a basic fact about human psychology, that people are more likely to read text when it is in an image--even if the image is purely text--than when it is just simply written text.  I wonder if they've done any studies on that.) So, to bring my own focus back to where it should be, here is what I will call the "fundamental theorem of atheism".  Yes, that's a very mathematical title--every branch (and sub-branch) of mathematics has a "fundamental theorem".  So, here it is for atheism.   The burden of proof lies on those who claim that there is a god to produce evidence of its existence .  So, here's the ima
15 comments
Read more