Skip to main content

Defying Gravity

Karen always told me about this wonderful musical that she had seen and that I needed to watch it sometime (I still haven't, but I want to).  I regret that I never did watch it with her because now that I've heard some of the music from it, I really want to watch it.  Anyway, most of you reading this blog probably have seen it.  It's called Wicked.  From what I understand, it's the story about Glinda's roommate (the wicked witch of the West, in the Wizard of Oz, who incidentally is named Elphaba, after the initials of the book's author) and how she became wicked.

One of the songs in the musical is called "Defying Gravity" and I find it to be rather inspirational.  I actually have no idea how it fits in with the rest of the play, since I've never seen it, and since the words in the original soundtrack include lines that are not clear without the context of the play, I will quote the slightly modified version that appears in the TV Show Glee, on the episode where Kurt tries to prove that he can sing a girl's part.  Without further babbling, here are the lyrics.
Something has changed within me
Something is not the same
I'm through with playing by the rules
Of someone else's game
Too late for second-guessing
Too late to go back to sleep
It's time to trust my instincts
Close my eyes: and leap!

It's time to try
Defying gravity
I think I'll try
Defying gravity
Kiss me goodbye
I am defying gravity
And you wont bring me down!

I'm through accepting limits
''cause someone says they're so
Some things I cannot change
But till I try, I'll never know!
Too long I've been afraid of
Losing love I guess I've lost
Well, if that's love
It comes at much too high a cost!

I'd sooner buy
Defying gravity
Kiss me goodbye
I'm defying gravity
I think I'll try
Defying gravity
And you wont bring me down!

I'd sooner buy
Defying gravity
Kiss me goodbye
I'm defying gravity
I think I'll try
Defying gravity
And you won't bring me down!
bring me down!



So, what is it about this song that I like?  I'm sure an argument could be made for how the LDS Church's standards are "the rules of someone else's game" and me repressing my homosexual feelings for so much of my life is "losing love I guess I've lost", but I think I'll leave that alone for now.  For one thing, I had Karen's love for three wonderful years and I wouldn't ever say that I lost anything there.  She loved me dearly and I am so grateful for that time.  I definitely didn't lose anything from entering or remaining in that marriage.

I'd really like to go a bit more general than that.  I have never been a person who lets other people set boundaries and limits on me.  I remember, my senior year of high school, I was dejected when I did not win the Math Sterling Scholar at the regional level (I won at my school), which I really thought was an injustice.  So, I decided that I wanted to prove to the world that I was good at math.  I studied really hard all school year long, and at the end of the school year they have a state math test, where all high school students in Utah are invited to attend.  I took first place in the test.  I graduated in 4 years (not counting a 2 year break for my mission trip) with a BS and MS in math.  I do not let other people dictate to me what I can and cannot do.  I set my own limits and my own expectations.

"It's time to try defying gravity."  If I set my sights on something, nothing will get in the way of me reaching that goal.  "You can't bring me down."  God did not send us here to this Earth to fail, to give up, to become discouraged.  Discouragement and despair are useless emotions.  As Paul wrote to Timothy "God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind." (2 Tim 1:7).  I take courage in everything that I do.  Of course, I like to make sure that I'm doing the right thing before I embark on a quest, but once I've embarked, I press forward with faith and with momentum until I've achieved my purpose.  I did so while I was missionary in Japan, I did so in college, I do so now as a graduate student, and I will continue to do so in all of my endeavors in life.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do you really believe?

This is Richard Dawkin's talk from yesterday's Reason Rally in Washington DC.  He makes several good points, but the one that stuck out to me the most was when he told people that they should challenge someone when they say they're religious.  The example he gave is when someone says they're Catholic, ask them if they really  believe that when a priest blesses a wafer that it actually turns into the body of Christ, or that the wine actually turns into his blood.  So, this post will be dedicated to me asking any of my reader base who are religious, do you really  believe what your religions teach? For those who are Christian (any denomination thereof), Do you really believe every word of the Bible to be the word of god?  If so, read every word of the Bible and then come back and answer the question again. Do you really believe that a snake tricked Eve into eating fruit that made her suddenly unfit to live in the paradisiacal garden god had just made for her? Do y

Hitchens v god

I'm rather ashamed to admit that I just recently discovered Christopher Hitchens. And, while I normally add my own thoughts and commentary to videos when I post them here, in nearly every Hitchens video that I've encountered, I have not a single word to add. He is so articulate and does such a good job of presenting his case that I couldn't possibly add anything to it.  I would definitely be interested if any of my readers have any comments to make in regards to what Hitches says in this video. Enjoy.  

The fundamental theorem of atheism

I think many times, with all the discussion of religion, science, atheism, etc, it can be easy to lose sight of the real purpose of what one is trying to accomplish.  Of course, this can happen in any discussion.  But, one of those ever-famous text-images found on Facebook caught my attention today.  (I do think it's funny, but from what I have seen a basic fact about human psychology, that people are more likely to read text when it is in an image--even if the image is purely text--than when it is just simply written text.  I wonder if they've done any studies on that.) So, to bring my own focus back to where it should be, here is what I will call the "fundamental theorem of atheism".  Yes, that's a very mathematical title--every branch (and sub-branch) of mathematics has a "fundamental theorem".  So, here it is for atheism.   The burden of proof lies on those who claim that there is a god to produce evidence of its existence .  So, here's the ima