Skip to main content

Together at last

After having been in a long-distance relationship for about four months now, Conrad and I are soon to be united, never again to part from one another.  I will be flying down to Texas tomorrow and then the two of us will drive up to Tennessee together, with his car and all of his stuff.  Then we will be together in body as well as in mind.

We have not seen each other since he came up here for my birthday in the middle of June.  This last month and a half has been excruciating.  Every particle of my body screams out "I want Conrad."  I cannot express in word or even in thought how extremely excited I am to see him in approximately 24 hours from this time.  The best part about it is that I will never have to live apart from him again.

I have the most romantic thoughts of going down to Dallas to rescue him from the extreme heat and then riding off into the sunset with him.  (Ok, so it would be away from the sunset since I'm east of Dallas.)  It has definitely been a long time since I have looked forward to something as much as this, and I know that it will be one of the happiest moments in my life when I get to hold him in my arms.  Oh, how joyful it will be.

Comments

  1. Well, someone is excited! I am extremely happy for the two of you. I am also excited to finally get to meet the infamous Connie!

    Be careful making the drive back to Tennessee. Talk to you both soon.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Are you getting married on this trip? Is Conrad moving to Tennessee permanently now? =)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Anyone is allowed to comment on this blog. As you can tell from reading my blog, I am very opinionated and I'm not afraid to share my opinion. You're welcome to disagree with me as mildly or vehemently as you like, but be aware that I will reply with my own opinions, very strongly. If you don't want that kind of open discussion, or you think it will hurt your feelings, then please avoid posting. I do try to be respectful, but my verbology often comes across as brusque.

Popular posts from this blog

Do you really believe?

This is Richard Dawkin's talk from yesterday's Reason Rally in Washington DC.  He makes several good points, but the one that stuck out to me the most was when he told people that they should challenge someone when they say they're religious.  The example he gave is when someone says they're Catholic, ask them if they really  believe that when a priest blesses a wafer that it actually turns into the body of Christ, or that the wine actually turns into his blood.  So, this post will be dedicated to me asking any of my reader base who are religious, do you really  believe what your religions teach? For those who are Christian (any denomination thereof), Do you really believe every word of the Bible to be the word of god?  If so, read every word of the Bible and then come back and answer the question again. Do you really believe that a snake tricked Eve into eating fruit that made her suddenly unfit to live in the paradisiacal garden god had just made for her? Do y

Hitchens v god

I'm rather ashamed to admit that I just recently discovered Christopher Hitchens. And, while I normally add my own thoughts and commentary to videos when I post them here, in nearly every Hitchens video that I've encountered, I have not a single word to add. He is so articulate and does such a good job of presenting his case that I couldn't possibly add anything to it.  I would definitely be interested if any of my readers have any comments to make in regards to what Hitches says in this video. Enjoy.  

The fundamental theorem of atheism

I think many times, with all the discussion of religion, science, atheism, etc, it can be easy to lose sight of the real purpose of what one is trying to accomplish.  Of course, this can happen in any discussion.  But, one of those ever-famous text-images found on Facebook caught my attention today.  (I do think it's funny, but from what I have seen a basic fact about human psychology, that people are more likely to read text when it is in an image--even if the image is purely text--than when it is just simply written text.  I wonder if they've done any studies on that.) So, to bring my own focus back to where it should be, here is what I will call the "fundamental theorem of atheism".  Yes, that's a very mathematical title--every branch (and sub-branch) of mathematics has a "fundamental theorem".  So, here it is for atheism.   The burden of proof lies on those who claim that there is a god to produce evidence of its existence .  So, here's the ima