Skip to main content

Know of the doctrine

There are many wise sayings found in the Bible, particularly those attributed to Jesus.  There's one I'd like to focus on in this post that I have personally found to be very useful in my own life--especially over the last year or so.  It is found in John 7:17, which reads "If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself."  I have heard this passage paraphrased many different ways in my years of attending the LDS church.  I suppose the way I would word it is "If you want to know whether a commandment is really for your own good and happiness, try it out and live it."  This is the ultimate empirical experiment. When you go clothes shopping, you commonly try the clothes on in a fitting room to see if they fit and if you like they way they look on you.  When you do homework for school, you try one thing and if it works, you keep going, otherwise you try something else.

I have found this advice to be extremely useful in my own life in deciding what commandments are from God and which ones are of men (the "or whether I speak of myself" option that Jesus mentioned).  Let me name a few here to demonstrate how effective it has been.

The counsel found in Matthew 6:2-4 I have found to be good counsel.  I enjoy helping other people out--giving to charities, picking up hitchhikers, helping friends move, and all sorts of random acts of kindness.  I have found that the times when I have done so without anyone else knowing about it have been the most thrilling.  It's kind of a game to see if I can get away with doing something nice without anyone else knowing about it.  When I was on my mission in Japan, my mission president told all of us that we should do service projects where we could be seen by members of the community, so as to build PR for the church.  This bothered me greatly because I didn't like the idea of showing off the service that I rendered.  I much preferred to do it quietly without being noticed.  I even expressed this concern to my mission president.  From these experiences I have had (both when I was asked to show off my service work and when I have chosen to do so quietly) I have come to the conclusion that the preferred method is that advised by Jesus as found in the passage above.

Next, I would like to address the counsel found in Alma 38:12, "bridle all your passions, that ye may be filled with love".  I have found that in order to truly love someone, I do need to bridle my passions.  I also should point out that I find it significant that the word "bridle" is used--not "deny" or "ignore" or "destroy", but "bridle".  The way a bridle works on a horse is by directing the horse in the direction that it should walk, not by prohibiting the horse from walking.  Therefore, one should control the passions that he feels and channel that energy to a useful and righteous purpose rather than consuming it on a whim.  That is, one should not be quick to anger or quick to satisfy the lusts of the body.  All of the times in my life when I have let my passions control me, I have found it difficult to love people.  I have found it difficult to love myself.  But all of the times in my life that I have bridled my passions and been in control of my own emotions, I have found it easy to love and I have been much happier.

I have also tried this experiment with the doctrine concerning homosexual behavior.  I went the first 27 years of my life without engaging in any homosexual activity at all (even so much as holding hands with another man, except one time in jest).  I even married a woman in order to test out the doctrine that all men should marry women.  This doctrine did not pass the test.  Having had a girlfriend (who became my wife) and a boyfriend, I can say with complete confidence that the teaching that man should not be with man is not of God.  It is not a teaching that will help me reach ultimate happiness or my highest potential.  I can be just as happy with a man as a straight man can be with a woman.  I do not need to be married to someone of the opposite sex in order to fulfill God's plan for me.  I have tested and tried this doctrine--just as is counseled in the Sermon on the Mount--and have found it to be of man, not of God.  I can safely say that, having a sweetheart to call my own, I have never been happier at any time in my life.  There are those that say that this happiness cannot last--that ultimately it will end in sorrow.  To that, I suppose my only reply is: wait and see.  We will see if at any future point in my life I come to the realization that this assessment is correct.  If such a time ever comes, I will humbly admit that it is so.  But, until that time comes, I say that a life in a homosexual relationship can be just as fulfilling to a gay person as life in a heterosexual relationship is for a straight person.

Comments

  1. I always find it interesting that someone completely apart from you can comment with authority on the "realness" of your happiness. I say, let them tend to their own flock and leave everyone else to do the same!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Anyone is allowed to comment on this blog. As you can tell from reading my blog, I am very opinionated and I'm not afraid to share my opinion. You're welcome to disagree with me as mildly or vehemently as you like, but be aware that I will reply with my own opinions, very strongly. If you don't want that kind of open discussion, or you think it will hurt your feelings, then please avoid posting. I do try to be respectful, but my verbology often comes across as brusque.

Popular posts from this blog

Do you really believe?

This is Richard Dawkin's talk from yesterday's Reason Rally in Washington DC.  He makes several good points, but the one that stuck out to me the most was when he told people that they should challenge someone when they say they're religious.  The example he gave is when someone says they're Catholic, ask them if they really  believe that when a priest blesses a wafer that it actually turns into the body of Christ, or that the wine actually turns into his blood.  So, this post will be dedicated to me asking any of my reader base who are religious, do you really  believe what your religions teach? For those who are Christian (any denomination thereof), Do you really believe every word of the Bible to be the word of god?  If so, read every word of the Bible and then come back and answer the question again. Do you really believe that a snake tricked Eve into eating fruit that made her suddenly unfit to live in the paradisiacal garden god had just made for her? Do y

Hitchens v god

I'm rather ashamed to admit that I just recently discovered Christopher Hitchens. And, while I normally add my own thoughts and commentary to videos when I post them here, in nearly every Hitchens video that I've encountered, I have not a single word to add. He is so articulate and does such a good job of presenting his case that I couldn't possibly add anything to it.  I would definitely be interested if any of my readers have any comments to make in regards to what Hitches says in this video. Enjoy.  

The fundamental theorem of atheism

I think many times, with all the discussion of religion, science, atheism, etc, it can be easy to lose sight of the real purpose of what one is trying to accomplish.  Of course, this can happen in any discussion.  But, one of those ever-famous text-images found on Facebook caught my attention today.  (I do think it's funny, but from what I have seen a basic fact about human psychology, that people are more likely to read text when it is in an image--even if the image is purely text--than when it is just simply written text.  I wonder if they've done any studies on that.) So, to bring my own focus back to where it should be, here is what I will call the "fundamental theorem of atheism".  Yes, that's a very mathematical title--every branch (and sub-branch) of mathematics has a "fundamental theorem".  So, here it is for atheism.   The burden of proof lies on those who claim that there is a god to produce evidence of its existence .  So, here's the ima