Skip to main content


I've had two major reasons to think about the topic of privilege during the last couple days.  The first was when one of my friends posted a Facebook status about Mormons being Christian.  He had a good point--Christianity had been defined for a couple thousand years by the time Mormonism came along.  Then Mormons come along and make quite a few changes--that God and Jesus are two separate beings being one of the most notable ones.  Christians would rightly feel affronted by this and want to distance themselves from the emerging religion.

This is an example of a privileged class feeling their privilege being taken away.  That is, they've defined what Christianity meant for so long that they feel they are entitled to do so.  Then, when someone else comes along and wants to do the same thing--that is, to put themselves on a level playing ground--the privileged group feels attacked because they shouldn't be equal than others, they should be better.

The second, and much more pronounced way in which this subject was brought up was last night.  I am at Dragon Con and there was a panel entitled "Sex in videogames", so naturally I was interested.  He talked about how one of the reasons why there is still sexism in videogames is because of privilege. The speaker was a writer for BioWare.  He has worked on several games that have had gay characters, and other non-traditional romance stories, including a transexual character.  On one of the forums that he regularly visits, one fan posted how outraged he was about all of this progressiveness.  He said (I'm paraphrasing) "You need to worry more about what us straight male gamers want.  What's funny is that a few years ago I wouldn't even have to say 'straight male gamers' I'd only have to say 'fans'."  The speaker showed us the quote and then said how he couldn't possibly have asked for a better example of the privilege phenomenon.

The video game that was in question was Dragon Age.  In that game, there are four possible romances. Whether you play as a male or a female character, there is one male and one female non-player character that you can flirt with and become romantically involved with.  So, really, everyone's on a level playing field.  The straight fan that wrote that on the forum is feeling his privilege being taken away.  Video games are no longer written strictly for straight men.  Some are being targeted to gay people and to women.  (In fact, 40% of gamers are women, so targeting them isn't a bad idea.)  He can't stand the idea of his privilege being taken away.  He doesn't want to be equal with other people, he wants to be better than other people.  His feelings become more important than other people's.

And so it is the same with the subject of gay marriage in real life.  Straight people have been privileged for centuries--certainly as long as this country has existed.  They have been able to marry as they please.  Now gay people are asking for the same right--not to be placed above straight people, not to have extra privileges, just to be equal--and it is interpreted as an attack on straight people because it is an attack on their privilege.  We seek to level the playing field.  We want gay people to have the same right as straight people--to marry the person of their choice.  Straight people don't want that.  They think that marriage belongs to them.  They are above us.  They perceive their loss of privilege as a loss of rights.  They feel that making everyone equal would somehow make them the oppressed group.

This is the effect of being privileged.  You get used to the privilege and then you feel under attack when your privilege is taken away.  Instead of perceiving equality as equality, it is perceived as "reverse discrimination".  The fact that women can vote and blacks are considered people is (or at least was) an affront to white men because they lost their privilege.  When in reality, all that is wanted is for everyone to be treated the same.

Popular posts from this blog

What's a gainer?

If you haven't already done so, I would suggest reading my previous post before reading this one.  It's sort of an introduction and gives the motivation.  Also, by way of disclosure, this post is not sexually explicit but it does touch on the topic of sexuality and how that relates to the subject at hand.

So, what is a gainer?  I'll relate, as best I can, the experiences I have gone through myself to help answer the question.  I remember when I was a young boy--perhaps around 6 or 7--I would have various fantasies.  Not sexual fantasies, just daydreaming about hypothetical situations that I thought were interesting or entertaining.  I had many different fantasies.  Sometimes I would fantasize about becoming very muscular, sometimes about becoming very fat.  
These fantasies varied in degree of magnitude and the subject of the fantasy.  Sometimes I myself would change weight--I would become muscular or fat.  Other times, I would do something to make other people fat or musc…

The scientific method vs the religious method

I find it interesting when people cite the fact that science keeps changing as a reason to disbelieve it and to believe instead in the "eternal" doctrines taught by some church or other.  Let's examine why science keeps changing.  Here's the scientific method.

Develop a hypothesis (this means "have a belief").Design an experiment to test the hypothesis.Conduct the experiment.Determine whether the hypothesis is believable based on the results of the experiment. This is why science keeps changing--because people notice flaws in it and correct them.  People once thought the solar system was geocentric, but now know that it's heliocentric.  How did this happen?  By using the scientific method.  Scientists are willing to admit that they're wrong.  They're willing to give up a bad idea when they see evidence that it makes no sense.  Contrast this with the religious method (simplified version). Have a belief.Look for evidence to support that belief.Ignor…

Cancel the gym

After I went to the gym this morning, I pulled in to the McDonald's drive through.  While waiting for my food, I played out in my mind a possible conversation I might have with someone concerning just this.  In fact, I have had many real conversations of similar nature.
"How was your morning?"
"It was good.  I went to the gym.  Then I grabbed a late breakfast at McDonald's on my way to work."
"Won't that cancel out?"
"Cancel what?"
"Going to McDonald's after the gym.  Won't that undo all the work you just did?"

I understand the humor.  I laugh about it.  It's funny.  And I think humor is an important thing, and that we should all laugh a little bit more and be offended a little bit less.  And so I write this not up-in-arms, but in the attempts of perhaps reaching some of those who literally believe this line of reasoning.

To the person who asserts that eating "cancels out" going to the gym, I ask just this…