Skip to main content

How skepticism helps religion

Some people of faith criticize science because it is ever-changing, and therefore cannot be "true" because if it were, it would remain constant.  This is a valid point.  But let us ask ourselves, why is science ever-changing?  It is because people ask questions.  People are skeptical.  The questions that people ask help improve science.  Therefore science becomes better and better over the years becoming a better approximation of the truth.  A similar application of skepticism is what improves religion.

For example, people New Testament times thought that someone with epilepsy was possessed with a devil.  If Christians still taught that people with epilepsy were possessed with devils, they would be laughed at.  Why is this?  It is because of the advance of knowledge.  Skeptics asked, "Are there really devils in these people or is there some other cause?" Now we know that causes of epilepsy and it is unrelated to being possessed with evil spirits.  So, believers can refine their story to make it more believable.  They stop claiming that people are possessed with evil spirits when they're really just epileptic.

People used to believe that the story of Noah was true.  Some people still believe that, but most people will say that it is just a fable or a parable and that their spiritual knowledge to be gained from that.  Again, this changes brought about because of skepticism.  It is not very likely that one man could build a boat that is big enough to fit two of every kind of an animal.  Nor is there any geological evidence that there was a world wide flood.  Questioning religion in this manner helps believers refine their story.  They need to come up with better explanations in order to defend their beliefs against questions.  This makes their religion more reasonable and more believable and therefore helps to preserve the number of believers.

This is how skepticism helps religion.  Their stories in religion which are simply too fantastical to believe, so skeptics question them, and the believers refine the stories or explain them as parables in order to satiate the skepticism.  There are very few people in first world countries now that would believe the religions of 1000 years ago or 2000 years ago because those beliefs are so illogical by today's standards.  And this is all was the result of people asking questions about their religious beliefs or the beliefs of others.

Popular posts from this blog

What's a gainer?

If you haven't already done so, I would suggest reading my previous post before reading this one.  It's sort of an introduction and gives the motivation.  Also, by way of disclosure, this post is not sexually explicit but it does touch on the topic of sexuality and how that relates to the subject at hand.

So, what is a gainer?  I'll relate, as best I can, the experiences I have gone through myself to help answer the question.  I remember when I was a young boy--perhaps around 6 or 7--I would have various fantasies.  Not sexual fantasies, just daydreaming about hypothetical situations that I thought were interesting or entertaining.  I had many different fantasies.  Sometimes I would fantasize about becoming very muscular, sometimes about becoming very fat.  
These fantasies varied in degree of magnitude and the subject of the fantasy.  Sometimes I myself would change weight--I would become muscular or fat.  Other times, I would do something to make other people fat or musc…

The scientific method vs the religious method

I find it interesting when people cite the fact that science keeps changing as a reason to disbelieve it and to believe instead in the "eternal" doctrines taught by some church or other.  Let's examine why science keeps changing.  Here's the scientific method.

Develop a hypothesis (this means "have a belief").Design an experiment to test the hypothesis.Conduct the experiment.Determine whether the hypothesis is believable based on the results of the experiment. This is why science keeps changing--because people notice flaws in it and correct them.  People once thought the solar system was geocentric, but now know that it's heliocentric.  How did this happen?  By using the scientific method.  Scientists are willing to admit that they're wrong.  They're willing to give up a bad idea when they see evidence that it makes no sense.  Contrast this with the religious method (simplified version). Have a belief.Look for evidence to support that belief.Ignor…

Cancel the gym

After I went to the gym this morning, I pulled in to the McDonald's drive through.  While waiting for my food, I played out in my mind a possible conversation I might have with someone concerning just this.  In fact, I have had many real conversations of similar nature.
"How was your morning?"
"It was good.  I went to the gym.  Then I grabbed a late breakfast at McDonald's on my way to work."
"Won't that cancel out?"
"Cancel what?"
"Going to McDonald's after the gym.  Won't that undo all the work you just did?"

I understand the humor.  I laugh about it.  It's funny.  And I think humor is an important thing, and that we should all laugh a little bit more and be offended a little bit less.  And so I write this not up-in-arms, but in the attempts of perhaps reaching some of those who literally believe this line of reasoning.

To the person who asserts that eating "cancels out" going to the gym, I ask just this…