Skip to main content

Humility vs Arrogance

Yesterday I blogged about Pastor Sean Harris who gave an extremely inappropriate sermon on Sunday.  Today I wish to follow up with more updates on the matter.  To his credit, he has now issued two official statements on his blog and even an audio statement, that he published on his podcast, to the effect of retracting his words from Sunday.

While his verbology still leaves something wanting, he has stated that he does not encourage child abuse.  In some places he says he wishes he would have worded things better and in other places he insists that he never said anything to encourage or condone domestic violence.  But, at the very least, he's repeatedly saying that he discourages physical violence as a method of correcting children, aside from spanking which he asserts the Bible justifies.

I would like to take this time to contrast his behavior with that of Mormon apostle Boyd K. Packer.  Elder Packer has given several speeches in his life that were severely anti-gay in nature.  As far as I am aware, he never advocated violence as a method of treatment, as Pastor Sean did.  However, he has said many hurtful and false things.  And he has not on any occasion retracted any of his words.  He has not apologized for any hurt he has caused.  He has not made any attempt at reconciliation with queers in any way.

This is the difference between humility and arrogance.  Pastor Sean is willing to admit that he was wrong and is doing what he can to try to reverse the damage his words caused.  This is a commendable effort.  I cannot excuse what he said on Sunday--such language is (in my opinion) inexcusable.  However, I admire him for doing what he can to undo the harm.  Elder Packer makes no such effort.  He remains arrogantly and stubbornly insistent that he has done no wrong, that he has not said anything false or contrary to god's will--even though many of the things he has said in previous talks are now directly contradicted by official publications of the church on the matter of homosexuality.

If you are interested, here is the link to Pastor Sean's blog wherein, at the moment, the three most recent posts are apologetic in nature (the least recent of which I quoted yesterday in my post).   I am also including direct links to each article, for the benefit of those who may read this in the future.
Audio statement of retraction
Official statement of retraction
Clarification

Popular posts from this blog

What's a gainer?

If you haven't already done so, I would suggest reading my previous post before reading this one.  It's sort of an introduction and gives the motivation.  Also, by way of disclosure, this post is not sexually explicit but it does touch on the topic of sexuality and how that relates to the subject at hand.

So, what is a gainer?  I'll relate, as best I can, the experiences I have gone through myself to help answer the question.  I remember when I was a young boy--perhaps around 6 or 7--I would have various fantasies.  Not sexual fantasies, just daydreaming about hypothetical situations that I thought were interesting or entertaining.  I had many different fantasies.  Sometimes I would fantasize about becoming very muscular, sometimes about becoming very fat.  
These fantasies varied in degree of magnitude and the subject of the fantasy.  Sometimes I myself would change weight--I would become muscular or fat.  Other times, I would do something to make other people fat or musc…

The scientific method vs the religious method

I find it interesting when people cite the fact that science keeps changing as a reason to disbelieve it and to believe instead in the "eternal" doctrines taught by some church or other.  Let's examine why science keeps changing.  Here's the scientific method.

Develop a hypothesis (this means "have a belief").Design an experiment to test the hypothesis.Conduct the experiment.Determine whether the hypothesis is believable based on the results of the experiment. This is why science keeps changing--because people notice flaws in it and correct them.  People once thought the solar system was geocentric, but now know that it's heliocentric.  How did this happen?  By using the scientific method.  Scientists are willing to admit that they're wrong.  They're willing to give up a bad idea when they see evidence that it makes no sense.  Contrast this with the religious method (simplified version). Have a belief.Look for evidence to support that belief.Ignor…

Cancel the gym

After I went to the gym this morning, I pulled in to the McDonald's drive through.  While waiting for my food, I played out in my mind a possible conversation I might have with someone concerning just this.  In fact, I have had many real conversations of similar nature.
"How was your morning?"
"It was good.  I went to the gym.  Then I grabbed a late breakfast at McDonald's on my way to work."
"Won't that cancel out?"
"Cancel what?"
"Going to McDonald's after the gym.  Won't that undo all the work you just did?"

I understand the humor.  I laugh about it.  It's funny.  And I think humor is an important thing, and that we should all laugh a little bit more and be offended a little bit less.  And so I write this not up-in-arms, but in the attempts of perhaps reaching some of those who literally believe this line of reasoning.

To the person who asserts that eating "cancels out" going to the gym, I ask just this…