Skip to main content

The Engagement

I've written about Conrad twice now--how we met, and then my second trip down to Dallas.  So, if you want more details about that part of our relationship, you can read about it in those two posts.  This post is to answer some specific questions about our engagement, since that is now public knowledge on facebook.  We've been engaged for a little while, but I wanted to let my parents know before I announced it publicly.  So, now that I've told my mother and Karen's, we decided to announce it.

First: "Who proposed?"  That's a difficult question to answer.  The first time the subject was brought up, Conrad simply said "I want to marry you."  So, in a way, you could say that he was the one who proposed.  Since that time, we've both proposed to the other amidst everyday conversation.  One time while we were chatting on Facebook I said "Will you marry me?" and he said "I'm eating tater tots."

Second: "When/where is the wedding?"  There are only a few places in America where gay marriage is legal at the moment, so our choices of location a slightly limited.  We have decided on the District of Columbia, mostly because we both want to see all of the historic sites there.  I've only been to DC once in my life--last summer--and I didn't have enough time to see everything I wanted to, and I don't think Conrad's ever been there.  We don't have all of the details cemented yet, but as far as time is concerned, we're aiming for mid-August.

Next: "Who is the man in the relationship?"  Please don't ask this question.  We're both men.  That's why it's a gay couple.  There seems to be a propensity of straight people to project the image of a straight relationship on a gay relationship.  Maybe sometimes one person in a gay relationship is markedly more effeminate and the other more masculine.  However, both Conrad and I have an X and a Y chromosome, so we are both the man in the relationship.

Finally: "Can I come to the wedding?"  Anyone who would like to attend is welcome.  We don't want to send out huge numbers of invitations to everyone that we know and offend some people who are averse to same-sex marriage, so we will be sending invitations only to those who request them.  If you would like a wedding invitation (which we won't have ready for at least a month), please email me or Conrad with your mailing address (or just email address if you only want a digital copy).  We will be happy to send an invitation to anyone who requests one, regardless of whether you can make it to the wedding.  We are planning for a very small number of guests, simply because of the two simple facts that many of our friends and family live far away from DC and a large portion of them do not wish to condone same-sex marriage in general.  But we will not turn away any who wish to attend.  If you want to celebrate in our happiness together with us, then we will be happy to have you.

Please post other questions you may have about our engagement here, or on facebook or email.  I'd be happy to make another post to answer any questions I overlooked here.  Mostly, I'm just excited to finally not have to keep it secret anymore.

Comments

  1. A very hearty congratulations, Keith. I wish both you and your future husband the VERY best! :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Congratulations, Keith! If I lived closer to DC, I'd definitely request an invite.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the details, Keith. I love you and Conrad!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Anyone is allowed to comment on this blog. As you can tell from reading my blog, I am very opinionated and I'm not afraid to share my opinion. You're welcome to disagree with me as mildly or vehemently as you like, but be aware that I will reply with my own opinions, very strongly. If you don't want that kind of open discussion, or you think it will hurt your feelings, then please avoid posting. I do try to be respectful, but my verbology often comes across as brusque.

Popular posts from this blog

Do you really believe?

This is Richard Dawkin's talk from yesterday's Reason Rally in Washington DC.  He makes several good points, but the one that stuck out to me the most was when he told people that they should challenge someone when they say they're religious.  The example he gave is when someone says they're Catholic, ask them if they really  believe that when a priest blesses a wafer that it actually turns into the body of Christ, or that the wine actually turns into his blood.  So, this post will be dedicated to me asking any of my reader base who are religious, do you really  believe what your religions teach? For those who are Christian (any denomination thereof), Do you really believe every word of the Bible to be the word of god?  If so, read every word of the Bible and then come back and answer the question again. Do you really believe that a snake tricked Eve into eating fruit that made her suddenly unfit to live in the paradisiacal garden god had just made for her? Do y

Hitchens v god

I'm rather ashamed to admit that I just recently discovered Christopher Hitchens. And, while I normally add my own thoughts and commentary to videos when I post them here, in nearly every Hitchens video that I've encountered, I have not a single word to add. He is so articulate and does such a good job of presenting his case that I couldn't possibly add anything to it.  I would definitely be interested if any of my readers have any comments to make in regards to what Hitches says in this video. Enjoy.  

The fundamental theorem of atheism

I think many times, with all the discussion of religion, science, atheism, etc, it can be easy to lose sight of the real purpose of what one is trying to accomplish.  Of course, this can happen in any discussion.  But, one of those ever-famous text-images found on Facebook caught my attention today.  (I do think it's funny, but from what I have seen a basic fact about human psychology, that people are more likely to read text when it is in an image--even if the image is purely text--than when it is just simply written text.  I wonder if they've done any studies on that.) So, to bring my own focus back to where it should be, here is what I will call the "fundamental theorem of atheism".  Yes, that's a very mathematical title--every branch (and sub-branch) of mathematics has a "fundamental theorem".  So, here it is for atheism.   The burden of proof lies on those who claim that there is a god to produce evidence of its existence .  So, here's the ima