Skip to main content

Merry Paganmas

I've known for some time now that Christmas is really just some Pagan holidays enveloped by Christianity.  I've also known that if Jesus was born during the Passover, which the Bible claims, then he would have been born in April not December.  In fact, Mormons hold that Jesus' birthday was April 6th.  So, I kind of chuckle under my breath when people say that it's Jesus' birthday.

At any rate, I'd never really thought before about the irony of Christians now claiming that people are trying to "take the Christ out of Christmas" when in fact it was never there to begin with.  They should be complaining that we've taken the Paganism out of Christmas, because that's what it was to begin with.  I suppose this is just one more example of how Christians can be hypocritical without even realizing it.  They take a holiday away from one religion (or several) and then get all huffy and offended when they feel like someone's trying to take a holiday away from them (even though this isn't the case).

People all too often argue that there's some sort of war on Christmas or on Christianity.  Why?  Well, in part because some people say "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" instead of "Merry Christmas".  I already wrote about why I think it's silly to complain about that.  Other people complain about efforts to remove Nativity scenes from public property.  I'm sorry, but one of the problems that early Americans had with Britain--one of the reasons they wanted to declare independence--was that they were tired of having only one choice for religion.  They didn't want to be dictated to by the Church of England.  They wanted people to be able to choose for themselves what religion to believe (or to believe in none at all).  So, merging church and state in this way is not a step toward freedom of religion, it is a step away from it.

To publicly support one religion by using public property and public funds to celebrate its holidays is a step toward an establishment of religion, which the Constitution forbids--and for good reason.  Therefore, requiring that public entities remain neutral in the religious sphere is only promoting religious tolerance, by allowing people to worship whichever religion they want and to celebrate whatever holiday they want.

Popular posts from this blog

What's a gainer?

If you haven't already done so, I would suggest reading my previous post before reading this one.  It's sort of an introduction and gives the motivation.  Also, by way of disclosure, this post is not sexually explicit but it does touch on the topic of sexuality and how that relates to the subject at hand.

So, what is a gainer?  I'll relate, as best I can, the experiences I have gone through myself to help answer the question.  I remember when I was a young boy--perhaps around 6 or 7--I would have various fantasies.  Not sexual fantasies, just daydreaming about hypothetical situations that I thought were interesting or entertaining.  I had many different fantasies.  Sometimes I would fantasize about becoming very muscular, sometimes about becoming very fat.  
These fantasies varied in degree of magnitude and the subject of the fantasy.  Sometimes I myself would change weight--I would become muscular or fat.  Other times, I would do something to make other people fat or musc…

The scientific method vs the religious method

I find it interesting when people cite the fact that science keeps changing as a reason to disbelieve it and to believe instead in the "eternal" doctrines taught by some church or other.  Let's examine why science keeps changing.  Here's the scientific method.

Develop a hypothesis (this means "have a belief").Design an experiment to test the hypothesis.Conduct the experiment.Determine whether the hypothesis is believable based on the results of the experiment. This is why science keeps changing--because people notice flaws in it and correct them.  People once thought the solar system was geocentric, but now know that it's heliocentric.  How did this happen?  By using the scientific method.  Scientists are willing to admit that they're wrong.  They're willing to give up a bad idea when they see evidence that it makes no sense.  Contrast this with the religious method (simplified version). Have a belief.Look for evidence to support that belief.Ignor…

Cancel the gym

After I went to the gym this morning, I pulled in to the McDonald's drive through.  While waiting for my food, I played out in my mind a possible conversation I might have with someone concerning just this.  In fact, I have had many real conversations of similar nature.
"How was your morning?"
"It was good.  I went to the gym.  Then I grabbed a late breakfast at McDonald's on my way to work."
"Won't that cancel out?"
"Cancel what?"
"Going to McDonald's after the gym.  Won't that undo all the work you just did?"

I understand the humor.  I laugh about it.  It's funny.  And I think humor is an important thing, and that we should all laugh a little bit more and be offended a little bit less.  And so I write this not up-in-arms, but in the attempts of perhaps reaching some of those who literally believe this line of reasoning.

To the person who asserts that eating "cancels out" going to the gym, I ask just this…