Skip to main content

I love you, but

This isn't directed at anyone, nor is it a complaint.  Take it as food for thought.  I don't know how many times in the last several months I've heard the phrase "I love you, but...".  In my post "What's a Mormon?" a few months ago, I briefly mentioned what I thought about this phrase.  Here I'll expound a bit more.

Of course, the most common situation where someone uses this phraseology is when they're talking to someone who's gay.  "I love you, but I just don't agree with your lifestyle choices." or "I love you, but I don't like the decisions you're making."  Yes, it happens in all sorts of scenarios, usually when someone doesn't live up to someone else's expectations (including the case of a friend or parent expecting a child to be straight and being disappointed when this is not the case).

So, first I want to ask the question, why is this necessary?  Is the need to express your disapproval of someone's choices/lifestyle/etc so compelling that you do so in the same breath as your expression of love?  Is your love for that person directly linked with your approval or disapproval of their choices?  Is it linked to their sexual orientation?  Do you mean to express conditional love or unconditional love?  If unconditional, then why do you feel any need to make an addendum to the quite simple sentence "I love you."?

When my family gets together, my older brothers (including my brother-in-law) invariably discuss sports--whatever sport is in season, or just sports in general.  I don't like sports.  I've never been interested in sports.  Many of the people in my family would watch sports games, including the olympics and everything, and I would watch as well, but it never piqued my interest.  So, when my brothers talk about sports, I have no clue what they're talking about.  They rattle off names as if they went to high school with these guys, and they rattle off stats and anecdotes and everything.  I feel completely lost whenever I try to listen or participate in the conversation.  But, when I tell them that I love them, I feel no need to say "I love you, but I just can't appreciate your interest in sports." or "I love you, but I don't agree with your jock-brain." because my love for them is in no way connected with their interest in sports.  Whether they like sports or not, they're my brothers and I love them.  I don't love them because they like sports, nor do I love them in spite of them liking sports.  They're just completely unrelated events.

Imagine how long an expression for love would be if you had the need to list everything that you disagree with someone on in it?  "I love you, but I disagree with your political views, I don't like your favorite color, I think you've arranged your front room with really strange furniture, I don't agree with the way you homeschool your children rather than sending them to public school, etc. etc."  Such things seem completely absurd when you say them.  And yet, for some reason people feel this propensity to say "I love you, but I don't agree with your choices" whenever they're talking to someone who's gay.  Why is this?  Is there some innate characteristic of love that people expect everyone who loves them agrees with them on everything?  Did I ever mention at any point in time that I assume people don't love me unless they believe homosexual behavior is moral and gay marriage should be legalized?

I love you.  That's all.  There's no qualification, you don't have to measure up to this expectation or that.  You don't have to agree with me and I don't have to agree with you.  That's what love is.  If you say you love me, I don't assume that all of my opinions are yours as well.  If I say I love you, I certainly don't mean that I agree with you on everything.  But whether I agree with you, your choices, your interests, your goals, your sexual orientation, your political ideas, etc, is completely irrelevant to my love for you.  To me, "I love you" means "I care about you.  I rejoice when you are happy, I mourn when you mourn, I am angered by the things that upset you, I want to comfort you when I see that you are down."  It doesn't mean that I accept all of your ideologies, or your views.  It doesn't mean that I think everything you do is moral, good, wonderful, etc.  So, I don't need to explicitly state that when I express my love for you.  I can just say "I love you" and leave it at that.

Most of my friends are religious--in fact, most are Mormon.  I love them, even though I disagree with their religious views.  Most of my friends go to football games regularly.  I love them, even though I can't stand football (more specifically, the crowd mentality that prevails at the stadium).  Most of my friends are republican, and nearly all the rest are democrats.  I love them, even though I can't say that I subscribe to the platforms of either party, nor do I believe there are many politicians in either party whom I could--in good conscience--vote for.  Many of my (male) friends like action movies.  I watch these movies with them out of friendship, but I do not enjoy violence, blood, or gore.  I love these people even though I do not like these movies.  In each of these cases, I have never felt any need to add anything to the phrase "I love you" when expressing this love for anyone in any of these categories.  "I love you, but you're a republican." seems a bit unnecessary.

Perhaps it is that you aren't saying this statement of "I love you, but I don't agree with your choices." because you want to express love, but because you really want to say that you disagree with that person being/doing whatever it is you're saying you disagree with.  If this is the case, why not leave the love out of it?  Why not just be honest and say "I think homosexuality is immoral." or whatever's on your mind?  Does saying "I love you" at the beginning somehow soften the blow?  Do you think that the person you're talking to will think that you hate them because of what you're about to say?  Of all the people who have told me that they support the Christian tradition of homosexuality being immoral, I have never felt that their declaration of belief to me was an expression of hatred.  I have never felt hate from anyone who has told me their personal feelings.  The fact that they want to share their feelings with me is touching, and makes me think that they care about me.  The fact that they want me to do what is right, to be moral and upstanding,  is a touching sentiment.  When I grade my students' papers and mark all of the answers that they got wrong, I don't add "I love you, but you missed some points on this test.".  (If I did, I'd probably have a lawsuit on my hands.)

Maybe what you mean to say instead of "I love you, but..." is "Because I love you...".  Maybe you want to say "Because I love you, I want you to be happy, so I'm going to share with you one way that I think that can happen."  Or "Because I love you, I want you to always do what is right.  I think you're doing something wrong, so here's what I think you should do to fix it."  This way, you're not making your love and your advice work against each other, you're making them work together.  Your love is the motive for helping a friend out.

Comments

  1. Great post. I really like and agree with your conclusion.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I've never known this phrasing to be due to anything other than the reasons you mention in paragraph eight. When someone says "I love you, but I believe homosexuality is immoral," the second clause is the main idea. The phrase "I love you" in this context is not meant to convey the same meaning as "I love you" by itself. It's not necessarily that the love isn't genuine, but that it's just not the point.

    The "I love you" is there because the speaker is afraid that the listener will conflate lifestyle disapproval with lack of love. Given that most people with liberal views on homosexuality (which generally includes The Listeners) do equate the idea of "homosexuality as immorality" with discrimination, prejudice, and hatred—a lack of love—it seems sensible to contradict the conflation preemptively.

    I love you, but I think you're over thinking this.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Perhaps. I do over-think some things. But I think you're under-thinking it. I don't have any problem with anyone believing that homosexual behavior is immoral, not do I mind them telling me that. And while there are those who misinterpret this as discrimination or hate, I think that's the exception, not the rule. The borderline between affirming your beliefs and attempting to outlaw homosexuality is prettying glaring, though. Once you start amending the Constitution or establishing/supporting laws that make gay marriage illegal, you're not just affirming your own belief, you're attempting to make other people bow to your belief. From all the gay people I've talked to, it is this that they find to be hateful, discriminatory, or offensive. 

    But, like I said in my original post, if your intent is to declare your opposition to homosexuality, just come out and say it. Don't try to make yourself come across as noble and compassionate by appending "I love you" to the front. If what you say is true, then such an expression has nothing to do with love so it should be left out of the statement. 

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with this article. :)

    It shouldn't be "I love you... but, etc." it should be "Because I love you, and want nothing but good for you... etc."

    Or just an outright declaration of what you want to say (leaving love out of it).

    ReplyDelete
  5. This makes complete sense. I really enjoyed this post. That sounds like something I would say and actually do say. I say it to my husband all the time about his dumb jock brain. lol I like the way you've put this though. It really will make me think twice when I speak (and that's saying a lot from me... haha) Thanks for this post!! PS I am a stalker. lol I am David Ace's sister in law. I just ran into your blog and am really interested in it. :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yeah, when I saw the name Stanford, I figured you were related to Emilee. Cool stuff. Thanks for reading, and commenting.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Anyone is allowed to comment on this blog. As you can tell from reading my blog, I am very opinionated and I'm not afraid to share my opinion. You're welcome to disagree with me as mildly or vehemently as you like, but be aware that I will reply with my own opinions, very strongly. If you don't want that kind of open discussion, or you think it will hurt your feelings, then please avoid posting. I do try to be respectful, but my verbology often comes across as brusque.

Popular posts from this blog

Do you really believe?

This is Richard Dawkin's talk from yesterday's Reason Rally in Washington DC.  He makes several good points, but the one that stuck out to me the most was when he told people that they should challenge someone when they say they're religious.  The example he gave is when someone says they're Catholic, ask them if they really  believe that when a priest blesses a wafer that it actually turns into the body of Christ, or that the wine actually turns into his blood.  So, this post will be dedicated to me asking any of my reader base who are religious, do you really  believe what your religions teach? For those who are Christian (any denomination thereof), Do you really believe every word of the Bible to be the word of god?  If so, read every word of the Bible and then come back and answer the question again. Do you really believe that a snake tricked Eve into eating fruit that made her suddenly unfit to live in the paradisiacal garden god had just made for her? Do y

Hitchens v god

I'm rather ashamed to admit that I just recently discovered Christopher Hitchens. And, while I normally add my own thoughts and commentary to videos when I post them here, in nearly every Hitchens video that I've encountered, I have not a single word to add. He is so articulate and does such a good job of presenting his case that I couldn't possibly add anything to it.  I would definitely be interested if any of my readers have any comments to make in regards to what Hitches says in this video. Enjoy.  

The fundamental theorem of atheism

I think many times, with all the discussion of religion, science, atheism, etc, it can be easy to lose sight of the real purpose of what one is trying to accomplish.  Of course, this can happen in any discussion.  But, one of those ever-famous text-images found on Facebook caught my attention today.  (I do think it's funny, but from what I have seen a basic fact about human psychology, that people are more likely to read text when it is in an image--even if the image is purely text--than when it is just simply written text.  I wonder if they've done any studies on that.) So, to bring my own focus back to where it should be, here is what I will call the "fundamental theorem of atheism".  Yes, that's a very mathematical title--every branch (and sub-branch) of mathematics has a "fundamental theorem".  So, here it is for atheism.   The burden of proof lies on those who claim that there is a god to produce evidence of its existence .  So, here's the ima