Skip to main content

Unreasonableness

To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.  -Thomas Paine
So one thing that has really frustrated me about Trump supporters and about Trump himself is the level to which they are disconnected from reality.  I mean at first I was actually surprised--stunned--that so many people could believe something so different from what is actually the case.  But as time has gone on and I've thought about it more, I should actually be surprised if they were grounded in reality.  And this is because their most fundamental beliefs are not grounded in reality at all.

Consider the statistics on how religious people voted.  A majority of Christians voted for Trump.  An overwhelming majority of Mormons did.  Clinton did get a majority of Jews and other religious people.  I believe the best explanation for this is those people are minorities and have been targeted either by Trump's hateful rhetoric or that of his followers.

So the reason why I think it's perfectly natural for Trump supporters to be disconnected from reality is the simple fact that they live their lives disconnected from reality.  Fundamental Christians literally believe that the Earth was flooded about 4,000 years ago and that one man, his family, and two of each species of animal all got on a boat and survived like that for a year while it rained and then the rains dried up.  They literally believe that we're all descended from two humans who were created some 6,000 years ago.  They literally believe that there is a deity who listens to their prayers and responds to them in tangible ways.  Despite all of the evidence that has been shown to the contrary.  So, they are used to being told they are wrong.  They know that they are right despite people telling them they're wrong.  They're used to people claiming to have evidence to dispute their beliefs but holding on to those beliefs anyway.

That is precisely what is happening with Trump.  He claims the media is all fake--they never publish the truth all they publish is lies about him.  Despite the fact that good journalists do very well with citing their sources and verifying the facts they claim, Trumpeters are confident that the media is lying and will never speak the truth about Trump.  They are convinced climate change is not influenced by the burning of fossil fuels.  They are convinced that Obama was a non-citizen.  They are convinced that Hillary was more corrupt than Trump.  They are convinced that Trump has no ties to Russia.  They're convinced Trump won the popular vote and had more people at his inauguration than Obama.  Presenting them with facts to the contrary will not make them change their minds any more than presenting them with geological evidence will convince them that the Earth is billions of years old.

Attacking them will not make them change their minds.  Presenting them with facts will not make them change their minds.  They will explain why the facts you present them with are unreliable.  They might say that that source is invalid, or that they found another source which proves it wrong.  They might say it's just a matter of personal belief for them and they're entitled to their own beliefs.

The simple fact of the matter is we will need to get along with people who cannot be reasoned with--people who live in an alternate reality and will not accept facts which disagree with their pre-conceived notions.

So what can we do?  My own thoughts on the matter are to continue to stand up for truth and advocate for change in light of truth.  Stand steadfast in the advancement of critical thinking, empiricism, and science.  These efforts might not reach diehard Trump supporters.  But they might reach someone.

Another thing that I believe is vital for all of us is to practice what we preach.  If you have a belief, challenge it.  Ask not just what evidence you can find to support your belief, but what evidence can you find which rejects your belief?  What would be an indication that my belief is false, and can I find such evidence?  How would I know whether I was wrong?  When you see something online which you agree with, rather than immediately sharing it, find out if it's true or false.  There are so many sensational headlines these days which only serve to further polarize the nation.  Look into it.  See if it's real.  See if it's fake.  See if it's real but grossly exaggerated.  It is really something that deserves to be propagated?  I wish to make it my continual effort to sift through every belief I have, determine whether it is based in reality, cease to believe those which do not seem to be, and develop more beliefs which do seem to be.  I firmly believe that any hope for a brighter future rests in the electorate having a firm grip on reality.

Popular posts from this blog

What's a gainer?

If you haven't already done so, I would suggest reading my previous post before reading this one.  It's sort of an introduction and gives the motivation.  Also, by way of disclosure, this post is not sexually explicit but it does touch on the topic of sexuality and how that relates to the subject at hand.

So, what is a gainer?  I'll relate, as best I can, the experiences I have gone through myself to help answer the question.  I remember when I was a young boy--perhaps around 6 or 7--I would have various fantasies.  Not sexual fantasies, just daydreaming about hypothetical situations that I thought were interesting or entertaining.  I had many different fantasies.  Sometimes I would fantasize about becoming very muscular, sometimes about becoming very fat.  
These fantasies varied in degree of magnitude and the subject of the fantasy.  Sometimes I myself would change weight--I would become muscular or fat.  Other times, I would do something to make other people fat or musc…

The scientific method vs the religious method

I find it interesting when people cite the fact that science keeps changing as a reason to disbelieve it and to believe instead in the "eternal" doctrines taught by some church or other.  Let's examine why science keeps changing.  Here's the scientific method.

Develop a hypothesis (this means "have a belief").Design an experiment to test the hypothesis.Conduct the experiment.Determine whether the hypothesis is believable based on the results of the experiment. This is why science keeps changing--because people notice flaws in it and correct them.  People once thought the solar system was geocentric, but now know that it's heliocentric.  How did this happen?  By using the scientific method.  Scientists are willing to admit that they're wrong.  They're willing to give up a bad idea when they see evidence that it makes no sense.  Contrast this with the religious method (simplified version). Have a belief.Look for evidence to support that belief.Ignor…

Cancel the gym

After I went to the gym this morning, I pulled in to the McDonald's drive through.  While waiting for my food, I played out in my mind a possible conversation I might have with someone concerning just this.  In fact, I have had many real conversations of similar nature.
"How was your morning?"
"It was good.  I went to the gym.  Then I grabbed a late breakfast at McDonald's on my way to work."
"Won't that cancel out?"
"Cancel what?"
"Going to McDonald's after the gym.  Won't that undo all the work you just did?"

I understand the humor.  I laugh about it.  It's funny.  And I think humor is an important thing, and that we should all laugh a little bit more and be offended a little bit less.  And so I write this not up-in-arms, but in the attempts of perhaps reaching some of those who literally believe this line of reasoning.

To the person who asserts that eating "cancels out" going to the gym, I ask just this…