Skip to main content


I believe that ostracism can be a good thing.  I've talked about it a bit in earlier posts.  I consider the effects of ostracism.  When a society believes a certain action to be unacceptable--to be detrimental to the good of the society--its members often ostracize those who perform the action in question.  And this is often an effective method of dealing with problems.  Consider, for example, the recent action of Pope Francis.  He excommunicated a priest who sexually abused several teenagers.  The offender was apparently also sentenced to serve several years in prison for this action.  Both of these punishments--the excommunication and the prison sentence (which, if I understand the article correctly, he ended up not serving) are a form of ostracism.  Both actions send the message to the offender and to the rest of society "We will not tolerate sexual assault of minors."  

My parents taught me the value of ostracism in a very small scale.  For example, I was told as a child that when a bully teases me, I should ignore them rather than giving them the satisfaction of provoking me to anger.  This has been a useful skill throughout my life, and one that I sometimes forget.  But, in a small way, I am ostracizing those whose behavior I feel is inappropriate.  On a larger scale, we see things such as those who build a human wall to protect grieving family members from the tirade of the radical Westboro Baptist Church.  The community comes together to make the statement that a certain action is intolerable.

I choose to ostracize many people in my personal life.  I will not tolerate people who are bigoted toward me or others.  I have estranged myself from several of the members of my extended family because they continually persecuted me for being gay or atheist.  There are many people that I no longer talk to because of tensions of this nature.  I find such behavior inappropriate and I want to send that message clearly.  

But I also believe that ostracism is far too often abused and overused.  In fact, bigotry itself is a form of ostracism and I believe that it is an abuse.  White people ostracize black people.  Straight people ostracize gay people.  Cis-gendered people ostracize transgendered people.  There are various different reasons given for different types of bigotry, but fundamentally it is the same as any form of ostracism--the message "You are doing something we do not like" is being sent, in a strong way.

I believe that the simple answer is all in perspective.  I think that I should look for reasons to be inclusive, not exclusive.  I believe that it is acceptable to ostracize people when just cause is present, but I think that I should look for reasons to include people and socialize with them rather than looking for reasons to ostracize people and distance myself from them.  In other words, I think that reasons to ostracize people will show themselves without me looking for them.  I don't need to actively find fault with other people in order to score points against them in some imaginary war.  I don't need to see how rapidly I can expand the list of people I've blocked on Facebook.  I can handle situations as they arise, but follow the rule of cooperation rather than ostracism.  

I have no reason to ostracize any particular class of people.  If I were to ostracize black people, I wouldn't have a job.  If I were to ostracize straight people, I wouldn't have a home.  If I were to ostracize people based on what class they belong to, I would be ignorant and bigoted.  Instead, I need to embrace all people I encounter, look for reasons to get along, look for common ground.  There is the key to building a more harmonious future.  I have a richer and fuller life if I meet and socialize with a wider array of people.  I will be personally enriched, and so will those with whom I interact.

Popular posts from this blog

What's a gainer?

If you haven't already done so, I would suggest reading my previous post before reading this one.  It's sort of an introduction and gives the motivation.  Also, by way of disclosure, this post is not sexually explicit but it does touch on the topic of sexuality and how that relates to the subject at hand.

So, what is a gainer?  I'll relate, as best I can, the experiences I have gone through myself to help answer the question.  I remember when I was a young boy--perhaps around 6 or 7--I would have various fantasies.  Not sexual fantasies, just daydreaming about hypothetical situations that I thought were interesting or entertaining.  I had many different fantasies.  Sometimes I would fantasize about becoming very muscular, sometimes about becoming very fat.  
These fantasies varied in degree of magnitude and the subject of the fantasy.  Sometimes I myself would change weight--I would become muscular or fat.  Other times, I would do something to make other people fat or musc…

Karing about others

Mostly because I have been thinking about her lately, I feel compelled to write about someone who was very dear to me.  Many people who have met me in the last several years may not be aware of the fact that I was married to a woman for 3 years. I understand there can be lots of confusion whenever I mention it, and misunderstandings or misconceptions might occur. So I would like to take this opportunity to discuss my feelings about her.

Shortly after I came out, I attended a party for ex-Mormon gay people. Many of them had been married (to someone of the opposite sex), as I had. Most of those marriages had ended in divorce. Sometimes the divorce was very ugly, other times it was rather pleasant and they remained friends throughout the process. I assume it is because of the ugly divorce scenarios that this statement was made to me. Upon revealing that I had previously been married to a woman and that the marriage had ended in her death, a man said to me that it was good that it had end…

The scientific method vs the religious method

I find it interesting when people cite the fact that science keeps changing as a reason to disbelieve it and to believe instead in the "eternal" doctrines taught by some church or other.  Let's examine why science keeps changing.  Here's the scientific method.

Develop a hypothesis (this means "have a belief").Design an experiment to test the hypothesis.Conduct the experiment.Determine whether the hypothesis is believable based on the results of the experiment. This is why science keeps changing--because people notice flaws in it and correct them.  People once thought the solar system was geocentric, but now know that it's heliocentric.  How did this happen?  By using the scientific method.  Scientists are willing to admit that they're wrong.  They're willing to give up a bad idea when they see evidence that it makes no sense.  Contrast this with the religious method (simplified version). Have a belief.Look for evidence to support that belief.Ignor…