Skip to main content

Brendan Eich

Brendan Eich was recently named CEO of Mozilla Corp.  This was a big to-do because he is known to be anti-marriage equality.  OkCupid semi-blocked Mozilla users from accessing their site in protest.  I say semi-blocked because they could still go through to the site but before they did, there was a page to inform them why OkCupid thought they should use a different browser.

So, apparently, Eich just resigned from the position.  One gay blogger said he was disgusted that the gay community did this to him. One thing he said I agree with.  "If we are about intimidating the free speech of others, we are no better than the anti-gay bullies who came before us."  I think that it's important to avoid bullying.  I think it's important to allow people the freedom to hold their own opinions.  But to me that's not what this issue is about.

I read another article that I feel explains my personal feelings about the matter much better.  See, to me, the issue isn't about whether Eich is just speaking his own opinion.  It really isn't.  It's about the fact that his opinion is that certain people (queers) should have different rights than other people (straights).  That is to say, he is a bigot.  He believes that certain people should be privileged and other people should not be.  He believes in inequality.

Another thing that is significant is that he was named CEO.  He has a lot of power in that position.  He isn't just an individual expressing his opinions, which he has a Constitutional right to do.  If this story were about Brendan Eich the taxicab driver being fired because he supported Prop 8, that would be a different story.  But it is a man who is entrusted with the executive power of a major company.  It is an influential man.  And for the company to instate him as CEO when he personally believes that discrimination is acceptable sends the message that the company believes that discrimination is acceptable.  But it isn't.

Ostracism is a good and useful tool in correcting bad behaviors.  Yes, we should be diverse.  We should allow people to be different and to hold differing views.  But there are some things we should not tolerate.  We don't need to tolerate murder.  We don't need to tolerate theft.  Even if there's someone out there who believes that murder is okay.  That person certainly has the right to say that ey feels that murder is acceptable.  But if Google were to make that person their CEO, that would be a statement that Google believes that murder is okay.  It would send the message to the thousands of its employees that their lives could be taken at any moment.  And that's a horrible message to send.

Just so, having a person in a place of authority when that person believes that certain humans deserve more rights than other humans is going to be bad for PR.  It should be bad for PR.  What happened with Eich is precisely what I believe should have happened.  They shouldn't have people in charge who are opponents of equality.  The society I believe we should create is one where all people are treated equally.  So those who feel that inequality should exist, such as Eich, should not be promoted.  They should not be lauded and given authority over other people.  They should be ostracized and their beliefs should be exposed for the bigotry that they are.

Popular posts from this blog

What's a gainer?

If you haven't already done so, I would suggest reading my previous post before reading this one.  It's sort of an introduction and gives the motivation.  Also, by way of disclosure, this post is not sexually explicit but it does touch on the topic of sexuality and how that relates to the subject at hand.

So, what is a gainer?  I'll relate, as best I can, the experiences I have gone through myself to help answer the question.  I remember when I was a young boy--perhaps around 6 or 7--I would have various fantasies.  Not sexual fantasies, just daydreaming about hypothetical situations that I thought were interesting or entertaining.  I had many different fantasies.  Sometimes I would fantasize about becoming very muscular, sometimes about becoming very fat.  
These fantasies varied in degree of magnitude and the subject of the fantasy.  Sometimes I myself would change weight--I would become muscular or fat.  Other times, I would do something to make other people fat or musc…

Karing about others

Mostly because I have been thinking about her lately, I feel compelled to write about someone who was very dear to me.  Many people who have met me in the last several years may not be aware of the fact that I was married to a woman for 3 years. I understand there can be lots of confusion whenever I mention it, and misunderstandings or misconceptions might occur. So I would like to take this opportunity to discuss my feelings about her.

Shortly after I came out, I attended a party for ex-Mormon gay people. Many of them had been married (to someone of the opposite sex), as I had. Most of those marriages had ended in divorce. Sometimes the divorce was very ugly, other times it was rather pleasant and they remained friends throughout the process. I assume it is because of the ugly divorce scenarios that this statement was made to me. Upon revealing that I had previously been married to a woman and that the marriage had ended in her death, a man said to me that it was good that it had end…

The scientific method vs the religious method

I find it interesting when people cite the fact that science keeps changing as a reason to disbelieve it and to believe instead in the "eternal" doctrines taught by some church or other.  Let's examine why science keeps changing.  Here's the scientific method.

Develop a hypothesis (this means "have a belief").Design an experiment to test the hypothesis.Conduct the experiment.Determine whether the hypothesis is believable based on the results of the experiment. This is why science keeps changing--because people notice flaws in it and correct them.  People once thought the solar system was geocentric, but now know that it's heliocentric.  How did this happen?  By using the scientific method.  Scientists are willing to admit that they're wrong.  They're willing to give up a bad idea when they see evidence that it makes no sense.  Contrast this with the religious method (simplified version). Have a belief.Look for evidence to support that belief.Ignor…