Skip to main content

Question authority

I posted this on my wall about a week ago.  Something I've been thinking about is how many of my friends do this.  In fact, I would say that most of the people I know are critical of the government, and of politicians.  Sadly, some of them are only critical of the "other" party, rather than of all politicians, but at least that's a start, I suppose.

But I really don't know too many people who say things like "We should trust the government absolutely" or "There's no need to be critical" or things like that.  Every once in a while, I encounter a statist of this type, but not that frequently.  It may be just because I'm a libertarian and tend to associate with other libertarians, but I find that many of my friends are entirely disenchanted with government and want to see a vast overhaul, or even a complete removal of government altogether.

At any rate, what I've been thinking about so much is how people apply this concept to government, but not to their own religion.  I do have some friends who are critical of their own beliefs, and who do not simply accept whatever their church leaders say, but I would say that this is the exception rather than the rule.  Most of the Christians that I know follow unquestioningly.  They object to the term "blindly", but it is without doubt an unquestioning obedience.  If their prophet says that gay people should not be allowed to marry, then they believe that and campaign to make/keep it illegal for gays to marry.  If their priest says that tattooed people are going to hell, then they feel justified in judging people with tattoos.

But I feel that the Franklin quote applies equally to any type of authority figure.  Indeed, when my own students feel it necessary to challenge me, I welcome their challenge.  I may have graded their test wrong.  I may have made a mistake while writing on the board or while lecturing.  I don't think that there is any authority which is or should be beyond questioning.  I think that people should question their church leaders, their political leaders, their community leaders, their employers, and any other authority figures in their lives.  Not just out of privilege or right, but as Franklin has said, out of a responsibility to do so.

I'm imagining what society would be like if people did question their leaders.  We wouldn't have as many cults, because people wouldn't follow their cult leaders blindly.  They'd demand an explanation for why they had to live in a special compound, or why they had to do some other radical thing.  We wouldn't have as many terrorists, because the people being asked to suicide bomb would question the rationality of such behavior.  I think that the world would be a much more peaceful and much less hateful place if people would do that.  Question your own beliefs.  Question the people that you choose to follow (or are required by law to follow).  Question those who hold authority over you.  Be critical.  Examine the teachings you are taught, use logic and reason to decide whether they are good or harmful.  Not just political leaders, but any leaders.  Church leaders, prophets, priests, popes, cardinals, etc.

Popular posts from this blog

What's a gainer?

If you haven't already done so, I would suggest reading my previous post before reading this one.  It's sort of an introduction and gives the motivation.  Also, by way of disclosure, this post is not sexually explicit but it does touch on the topic of sexuality and how that relates to the subject at hand.

So, what is a gainer?  I'll relate, as best I can, the experiences I have gone through myself to help answer the question.  I remember when I was a young boy--perhaps around 6 or 7--I would have various fantasies.  Not sexual fantasies, just daydreaming about hypothetical situations that I thought were interesting or entertaining.  I had many different fantasies.  Sometimes I would fantasize about becoming very muscular, sometimes about becoming very fat.  
These fantasies varied in degree of magnitude and the subject of the fantasy.  Sometimes I myself would change weight--I would become muscular or fat.  Other times, I would do something to make other people fat or musc…

Karing about others

Mostly because I have been thinking about her lately, I feel compelled to write about someone who was very dear to me.  Many people who have met me in the last several years may not be aware of the fact that I was married to a woman for 3 years. I understand there can be lots of confusion whenever I mention it, and misunderstandings or misconceptions might occur. So I would like to take this opportunity to discuss my feelings about her.

Shortly after I came out, I attended a party for ex-Mormon gay people. Many of them had been married (to someone of the opposite sex), as I had. Most of those marriages had ended in divorce. Sometimes the divorce was very ugly, other times it was rather pleasant and they remained friends throughout the process. I assume it is because of the ugly divorce scenarios that this statement was made to me. Upon revealing that I had previously been married to a woman and that the marriage had ended in her death, a man said to me that it was good that it had end…

The scientific method vs the religious method

I find it interesting when people cite the fact that science keeps changing as a reason to disbelieve it and to believe instead in the "eternal" doctrines taught by some church or other.  Let's examine why science keeps changing.  Here's the scientific method.

Develop a hypothesis (this means "have a belief").Design an experiment to test the hypothesis.Conduct the experiment.Determine whether the hypothesis is believable based on the results of the experiment. This is why science keeps changing--because people notice flaws in it and correct them.  People once thought the solar system was geocentric, but now know that it's heliocentric.  How did this happen?  By using the scientific method.  Scientists are willing to admit that they're wrong.  They're willing to give up a bad idea when they see evidence that it makes no sense.  Contrast this with the religious method (simplified version). Have a belief.Look for evidence to support that belief.Ignor…