Skip to main content

There were never such devoted sisters

It's been a while since I've listened to church dogma.  Almost two years.  Yes, I've had a few family members email me things like "We're praying for you" and stuff like that, but nothing really all that intense.  Nothing like a Sunday School lesson.

The sister missionaries in my ward have been coming over lately.  They dropped by around the time Conrad had his name removed from the church's records and have come over multiple times since we had a (female) roommate move in with us.

The last time they came, which was a few days ago, and today when they came, I couldn't help but realize how much my attitude toward religious teachings has changed.  At this point in time, it seems no more to me than utter and complete nonsense.  And it leaves me baffled.  I look at these two women, and they are intelligent and respectable women.  They are clearly sane and are well-adjusted to society. And yet the things that come out of their mouths are so utterly ridiculous.

One example was something that they said the other day when they came was that thing about how God answers prayers in many different ways.  That sometimes he says yes, sometimes he says no, and sometimes he just makes you wait.  How is this an indication that god answers prayers?  This is no different from the placebo effect.  If you are sick and you take a placebo, rather than the actual medicine, sometimes you will get better, sometimes you will stay the same, and sometimes you will get worse.  That's just the way it goes.  And taking the pill itself has absolutely zero effect on the outcome.  To me, this is completely obvious.  It is glaringly obvious.  How can anyone actually believe that a priesthood blessing of healing actually has an effect on the person being blessed?  It is no more effective than taking a sugar pill.

As I was listening to the sisters today, I didn't really hear the message they were sharing.  I just heard "we believe in fairy tales".  It just eludes me how they can devote a year and a half of their life to something so childish and nonsensical.  And that they can sit down and seriously relate these ideas and stories to someone and expect them to be taken earnestly.  I simply don't understand.

If I were to go door to door and tell people of the good news of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, the only people who would listen to me are those who have been diagnosed as mentally insane.  I would not be able to get a sane person to buy into such a silly tale.  And yet every day sane and mentally stable people relate such silly tales to each other, and take them seriously.  They talk of how muttering some words under their breath helped them locate their car keys, or how putting a drop of oil on someone's head healed their broken femur.  To me, there is no difference between these kinds of stories and the claim that the FSM gave me a free bowl of ramen every day of my freshman year of college when I would praise his saucy meatballs.

That's really how I see Christianity now.  It's weird to see so many grown people take it seriously.  It's weird to see some universities require belief in god in order to apply for employment.  I can't wrap my mind around how an institution of higher education wants only people who believe in such ridiculous nonsense to educate its students.  That makes absolutely no sense to me at all.

The sisters have said that they will be returning next Wednesday.  I am always kind and welcoming of people who visit my home.  I am also honest, and I will not hesitate to share my feelings with them as often as they are asked for.  They have given me no reason to be unkind to them, nor do I expect them to.  So I will be gracious, as I am toward all people.  And part of that graciousness is informing them of my true thoughts and feelings, which I have done and will continue to do.

Popular posts from this blog

What's a gainer?

If you haven't already done so, I would suggest reading my previous post before reading this one.  It's sort of an introduction and gives the motivation.  Also, by way of disclosure, this post is not sexually explicit but it does touch on the topic of sexuality and how that relates to the subject at hand.

So, what is a gainer?  I'll relate, as best I can, the experiences I have gone through myself to help answer the question.  I remember when I was a young boy--perhaps around 6 or 7--I would have various fantasies.  Not sexual fantasies, just daydreaming about hypothetical situations that I thought were interesting or entertaining.  I had many different fantasies.  Sometimes I would fantasize about becoming very muscular, sometimes about becoming very fat.  
These fantasies varied in degree of magnitude and the subject of the fantasy.  Sometimes I myself would change weight--I would become muscular or fat.  Other times, I would do something to make other people fat or musc…

Karing about others

Mostly because I have been thinking about her lately, I feel compelled to write about someone who was very dear to me.  Many people who have met me in the last several years may not be aware of the fact that I was married to a woman for 3 years. I understand there can be lots of confusion whenever I mention it, and misunderstandings or misconceptions might occur. So I would like to take this opportunity to discuss my feelings about her.

Shortly after I came out, I attended a party for ex-Mormon gay people. Many of them had been married (to someone of the opposite sex), as I had. Most of those marriages had ended in divorce. Sometimes the divorce was very ugly, other times it was rather pleasant and they remained friends throughout the process. I assume it is because of the ugly divorce scenarios that this statement was made to me. Upon revealing that I had previously been married to a woman and that the marriage had ended in her death, a man said to me that it was good that it had end…

The scientific method vs the religious method

I find it interesting when people cite the fact that science keeps changing as a reason to disbelieve it and to believe instead in the "eternal" doctrines taught by some church or other.  Let's examine why science keeps changing.  Here's the scientific method.

Develop a hypothesis (this means "have a belief").Design an experiment to test the hypothesis.Conduct the experiment.Determine whether the hypothesis is believable based on the results of the experiment. This is why science keeps changing--because people notice flaws in it and correct them.  People once thought the solar system was geocentric, but now know that it's heliocentric.  How did this happen?  By using the scientific method.  Scientists are willing to admit that they're wrong.  They're willing to give up a bad idea when they see evidence that it makes no sense.  Contrast this with the religious method (simplified version). Have a belief.Look for evidence to support that belief.Ignor…