Skip to main content

Many paths to the top of Mt. Fuji

A short while ago, I wrote about a video I had seen where an atheist recommended mocking religion as a method for helping religious people question their own beliefs.  In that post, I mentioned that I was unsure whether that approach was right for me or not.  I think that the above video contains my answer.  It is in fact right for me, and so are many other methods.  I don't think there is one single method which will be successful in leading all people to the truth.  Some may respond better to ridicule, some may respond better to simply living a happy and fulfilled life as an atheist.  As the Japanese say, there are many paths to the top of Mount Fuji.

One thing that I think is significant in this video is that the caller mentions one story about how he made his mother cry (or, really, how her religion made her cry).  And Matt (the man on the right) responded by saying that he has made many of his family members cry and has disappointed many of them.  I am in the same boat.  I have disappointed people, I have let people down and not lived up to their expectations of me.  I'm sure I've made people cry.  I've made a lot of enemies.  I've had many people write me personally to let me know that they are disappointed in me.  And I wish it didn't have to be that way.  I wish that I could be honest about my personal beliefs--or rather, lack thereof--and still have the approval of my family and friends.

But, anyway, watching this video has helped me to have renewed resolve in doing what I can to help people think rationally, to combat blind faith and magical thinking.  I will attempt every method I think appropriate to do so.  I will mock ridiculous ideas, I will love people who believe them, I will use logic and fact, I will use the Bible and other scripture.  I believe that the truth does set people free, and I view my actions as an attempt to free people.

Popular posts from this blog

What's a gainer?

If you haven't already done so, I would suggest reading my previous post before reading this one.  It's sort of an introduction and gives the motivation.  Also, by way of disclosure, this post is not sexually explicit but it does touch on the topic of sexuality and how that relates to the subject at hand.

So, what is a gainer?  I'll relate, as best I can, the experiences I have gone through myself to help answer the question.  I remember when I was a young boy--perhaps around 6 or 7--I would have various fantasies.  Not sexual fantasies, just daydreaming about hypothetical situations that I thought were interesting or entertaining.  I had many different fantasies.  Sometimes I would fantasize about becoming very muscular, sometimes about becoming very fat.  
These fantasies varied in degree of magnitude and the subject of the fantasy.  Sometimes I myself would change weight--I would become muscular or fat.  Other times, I would do something to make other people fat or musc…

Karing about others

Mostly because I have been thinking about her lately, I feel compelled to write about someone who was very dear to me.  Many people who have met me in the last several years may not be aware of the fact that I was married to a woman for 3 years. I understand there can be lots of confusion whenever I mention it, and misunderstandings or misconceptions might occur. So I would like to take this opportunity to discuss my feelings about her.

Shortly after I came out, I attended a party for ex-Mormon gay people. Many of them had been married (to someone of the opposite sex), as I had. Most of those marriages had ended in divorce. Sometimes the divorce was very ugly, other times it was rather pleasant and they remained friends throughout the process. I assume it is because of the ugly divorce scenarios that this statement was made to me. Upon revealing that I had previously been married to a woman and that the marriage had ended in her death, a man said to me that it was good that it had end…

The scientific method vs the religious method

I find it interesting when people cite the fact that science keeps changing as a reason to disbelieve it and to believe instead in the "eternal" doctrines taught by some church or other.  Let's examine why science keeps changing.  Here's the scientific method.

Develop a hypothesis (this means "have a belief").Design an experiment to test the hypothesis.Conduct the experiment.Determine whether the hypothesis is believable based on the results of the experiment. This is why science keeps changing--because people notice flaws in it and correct them.  People once thought the solar system was geocentric, but now know that it's heliocentric.  How did this happen?  By using the scientific method.  Scientists are willing to admit that they're wrong.  They're willing to give up a bad idea when they see evidence that it makes no sense.  Contrast this with the religious method (simplified version). Have a belief.Look for evidence to support that belief.Ignor…