Skip to main content

How NOT to launch a game

When I was quite young, my dad had a Mac and a game called "SimCity".  I was enthralled by this game.  You could build a city.  You needed police stations to fight crime, fire departments to prevent and clean up fires, and power plants to power all the buildings.  I played it hours on end.  I've never been a violent person, and while I enjoy playing video games which are violent in nature, I usually wish that they were less violent.  This game was perfect because I could play it without killing anyone. And it was tons of fun.

Then, they made SimCity 2000 and 3000, and then SimCity 4.  I probably played SC2K the most because I never got 3K and I only got 4 just a couple years ago.  Each one was an improvement on the last.  In fact, the original game to SC2K was probably the biggest improvement.  So, you can imagine how excited I was near the 3rd or 4th quarter of last year when I found out that Maxis (now a brand of EA) was developing a new SimCity game.  (Of course, I think it's weird that they're going with just "SimCity", rather than "SimCity 5" or something like that, but most people are calling it SC5 anyway.)

So, I watched all of the YouTube videos that were available.  I followed their blog.  And I pre-ordered the game.  Actually, I thought I pre-ordered.  Apparently there was a transaction error and my card was never billed, so I had to have them cancel that order and re-order after the release date so I could actually download the game.

I was really excited for the launch this last Tuesday.  It was going to be perfect.  I defended my dissertation on Tuesday, so now I'm just "coasting" to the end of the semester.  The game came out the same day, so I planned to celebrate passing my defense by playing the game.  Well, that's when I was met with this kind of frustration.  Actually, the guy in this video was lucky.  He was able to download the game.  I wasn't even able to do that.  When I went to download it, I got the error "This game has not yet been released", even though it was well after EA had announced that the game was available for download.  As I said above, it turned out the reason I wasn't able to download it was because it hadn't cleared my account.  But, I couldn't have been expected to know that because upon ordering two months ago, I got an email saying "this email serves as your proof of purchase" and on the Origin account where the game was to be downloaded, it told me "you have successfully pre-ordered SimCity".  So, that's their first fail: telling me I had purchased the game when I really hadn't.

So, they cancelled the first order and I re-ordered it.  This time I was actually able to download the game.  However, I have not yet been able to play the game.  Every time I open it up, I get error messages about their servers.  Either I can't connect, can't authenticate, or when I try to start a new city I get disconnected.  It's quite frustrating.

As to be expected, people are complaining about this.  Big time.  And I'm one of the loudest and most obnoxious complainers.  On Facebook and Twitter, and I assume tons of other sites as well (but those are the only two I use).  Well, all sorts of people have been writing about this.  CNet just wrote about it.  And now I'm writing about it.

I've heard many people saying things like "game launches are always like this" or "You've never participated in a game launch, have you?"  But, that's not true.  Last year, I pre-ordered Guild Wars 2.  I played one beta event prior to release, and it was great.  Then I played at the actual release (actually, I started playing 3 days before the release, since I pre-ordered).  There was no problem on release date.  People who wanted to log in were able to.  There were tons of people playing, but if one map filled up, they'd just create another layer and put people there as a sort of "overflow".  It all worked very well and very smoothly.  There is absolutely no need for all of the garbage that's going on with EA right now.

Many people are asking for a refund.  Understandably, they want their money back since the product they purchased doesn't work.  Most companies have such a return policy: if you're not satisfied, return the product for a full refund.  Not EA.  EA has a strict no-refund policy on any digital download.  And they're enforcing it.  Big time.  Now, I don't want my money back.  I want the game.  I want to play the game.  But if someone does want their money back, they should be able to get it back.  After all, the whole purpose of EA doing always online for this game is prevent pirating, so even if the refunded person kept the game installed on eir machine, it wouldn't run because EA could easily deactivate the account upon granting the refund.  In short, it costs EA nothing to give refunds and it would go a long way in the PR department.  However, they have chosen to do this instead.  This is the thing that makes me absolutely irate.  Not just frustrated that I have to wait a couple weeks to play a game, but irate that they're treating customers like this.  If a customer asks for a refund, you do not, I repeat, not under any circumstance threaten to deactivate their account simply for asking for a refund.  That's the worst possible thing you could do.  You can decline the refund.  Okay, not a smart move, but at least it isn't suicide.  Do not threaten to ban the person.  That's not good business.  It's extremely bad business, and it's a great way to make lots of enemies really fast.  Shame on the hasty non-thinking EA rep who made this threat.  He should be fired.

Popular posts from this blog

What's a gainer?

If you haven't already done so, I would suggest reading my previous post before reading this one.  It's sort of an introduction and gives the motivation.  Also, by way of disclosure, this post is not sexually explicit but it does touch on the topic of sexuality and how that relates to the subject at hand.

So, what is a gainer?  I'll relate, as best I can, the experiences I have gone through myself to help answer the question.  I remember when I was a young boy--perhaps around 6 or 7--I would have various fantasies.  Not sexual fantasies, just daydreaming about hypothetical situations that I thought were interesting or entertaining.  I had many different fantasies.  Sometimes I would fantasize about becoming very muscular, sometimes about becoming very fat.  
These fantasies varied in degree of magnitude and the subject of the fantasy.  Sometimes I myself would change weight--I would become muscular or fat.  Other times, I would do something to make other people fat or musc…

Karing about others

Mostly because I have been thinking about her lately, I feel compelled to write about someone who was very dear to me.  Many people who have met me in the last several years may not be aware of the fact that I was married to a woman for 3 years. I understand there can be lots of confusion whenever I mention it, and misunderstandings or misconceptions might occur. So I would like to take this opportunity to discuss my feelings about her.

Shortly after I came out, I attended a party for ex-Mormon gay people. Many of them had been married (to someone of the opposite sex), as I had. Most of those marriages had ended in divorce. Sometimes the divorce was very ugly, other times it was rather pleasant and they remained friends throughout the process. I assume it is because of the ugly divorce scenarios that this statement was made to me. Upon revealing that I had previously been married to a woman and that the marriage had ended in her death, a man said to me that it was good that it had end…

The scientific method vs the religious method

I find it interesting when people cite the fact that science keeps changing as a reason to disbelieve it and to believe instead in the "eternal" doctrines taught by some church or other.  Let's examine why science keeps changing.  Here's the scientific method.

Develop a hypothesis (this means "have a belief").Design an experiment to test the hypothesis.Conduct the experiment.Determine whether the hypothesis is believable based on the results of the experiment. This is why science keeps changing--because people notice flaws in it and correct them.  People once thought the solar system was geocentric, but now know that it's heliocentric.  How did this happen?  By using the scientific method.  Scientists are willing to admit that they're wrong.  They're willing to give up a bad idea when they see evidence that it makes no sense.  Contrast this with the religious method (simplified version). Have a belief.Look for evidence to support that belief.Ignor…