Skip to main content

The rationale of life forms

I find that the secular explanation of things is often far more logical than the religious explanation.  The problem with claiming that there is one intelligent being (or even a whole group of them, if you want to be polytheistic) which designed everything in the universe with a purpose and has a perfect plan for all of his creations is that you need to come up with explanations for everything.  You need to justify why the parasites and diseases exist.

The most common theist answer to the question of "why is there suffering in the world" (in this case, more specifically, "Why is there a parasitic catfish that swims up your private parts and eats you from the inside out?") is that we are to know pain in order to distinguish it from pleasure.  We need to know the bad to discern from the good.  We go through trials in this life so that we can overcome them and become stronger.  So, God makes these parasitic catfish and allows them to crawl up your urinary tract and do all kinds of damage to your innards because in the long run something good happens.

What is the secular answer?  That all forms of life evolved to what they are now through a long series of mutations.  Each species is doing what it can to survive and perpetuate itself.  Parasites evolved mechanisms for feeding off of larger organisms, usually small enough to avoid detection.  They have survived because their parasitic nature has helped them to do so.  Sometimes these parasites actually live in symbiosis with the organisms they inhabit, other times they cause the host to become ill and even die.  But why do these catfish exist?  Because they evolved into what they are now, because natural selection has favored the mechanisms that these organisms have developed.  There is no further explanation necessary because there is no claim that these creatures were created by an intelligent being with a plan in mind for them.

How about mosquitos?  Tics?  Ringworms?  Viruses?  Poisonous snakes?  All of these are dangerous and harmful.  An explanation must be given for how they fit into God's plan, if one is to adopt the belief that they have been created by an intelligent being.  But, with the world view of evolution, it is quite clear that they simply evolved that way.  There are visible benefits to the mechanisms they have evolved.  A mosquito drinking the blood of another organism makes sense because blood is always rich in nutrients, thus the mosquito is well-fed.  Snakes evolved poison to kill or debilitate their prey and then consume it.  They exist because what they do works.  They are capable of surviving, and thus they survive.  There is no need to come up with a plan that includes an explanation for why they are there.

We, as intelligent beings, are capable of finding purpose or meaning.  Sometimes we find it where it is genuine and other times we may find it where it does not exist.  We can assign purpose to all creatures. We can give explanations such as that given by theists.  But, that does not mean that the purpose we assign is accurate, nor does it mean that the creature assigned that purpose is actually fulfilling that purpose.  Yes, we may be able to contrast bad situations with good ones to better appreciate the good.  However, does that mean that snakes were invented simply to allow us to do that?  To me, this is absurd.

No, it seems much more logical to me to assume that these creatures exist simply because they have developed survival mechanisms that were superior to other species which no longer exist.  We humans are the most prolific and populous species because we have developed superior intelligence, which I believe we have demonstrated far outweighs any other single mechanism ever evolved by any species.  In fact, it is because it so greatly facilitates our ability to adapt.  If the climate grows cold, we are capable of understanding that and wearing thicker clothing and building more insulating shelter, whereas an unintelligent species would not be able to do so.  It would have to rely on physical changes in its own body, which may not happen fast enough to save the species from extinction.

Popular posts from this blog

What's a gainer?

If you haven't already done so, I would suggest reading my previous post before reading this one.  It's sort of an introduction and gives the motivation.  Also, by way of disclosure, this post is not sexually explicit but it does touch on the topic of sexuality and how that relates to the subject at hand.

So, what is a gainer?  I'll relate, as best I can, the experiences I have gone through myself to help answer the question.  I remember when I was a young boy--perhaps around 6 or 7--I would have various fantasies.  Not sexual fantasies, just daydreaming about hypothetical situations that I thought were interesting or entertaining.  I had many different fantasies.  Sometimes I would fantasize about becoming very muscular, sometimes about becoming very fat.  
These fantasies varied in degree of magnitude and the subject of the fantasy.  Sometimes I myself would change weight--I would become muscular or fat.  Other times, I would do something to make other people fat or musc…

Karing about others

Mostly because I have been thinking about her lately, I feel compelled to write about someone who was very dear to me.  Many people who have met me in the last several years may not be aware of the fact that I was married to a woman for 3 years. I understand there can be lots of confusion whenever I mention it, and misunderstandings or misconceptions might occur. So I would like to take this opportunity to discuss my feelings about her.

Shortly after I came out, I attended a party for ex-Mormon gay people. Many of them had been married (to someone of the opposite sex), as I had. Most of those marriages had ended in divorce. Sometimes the divorce was very ugly, other times it was rather pleasant and they remained friends throughout the process. I assume it is because of the ugly divorce scenarios that this statement was made to me. Upon revealing that I had previously been married to a woman and that the marriage had ended in her death, a man said to me that it was good that it had end…

The scientific method vs the religious method

I find it interesting when people cite the fact that science keeps changing as a reason to disbelieve it and to believe instead in the "eternal" doctrines taught by some church or other.  Let's examine why science keeps changing.  Here's the scientific method.

Develop a hypothesis (this means "have a belief").Design an experiment to test the hypothesis.Conduct the experiment.Determine whether the hypothesis is believable based on the results of the experiment. This is why science keeps changing--because people notice flaws in it and correct them.  People once thought the solar system was geocentric, but now know that it's heliocentric.  How did this happen?  By using the scientific method.  Scientists are willing to admit that they're wrong.  They're willing to give up a bad idea when they see evidence that it makes no sense.  Contrast this with the religious method (simplified version). Have a belief.Look for evidence to support that belief.Ignor…