Skip to main content

The impact of your actions

I'm sure this will easily sound like a self-pity party, or complaining, but I really don't mean it to be that way.  My hope in writing this post is to cause those who read it to introspectively search themselves and try to understand why they do the things they do.

I also need to add that my family has not been rotten throughout this process.  What I'm about to say might make it seem like that.  On the contrary, I actually have it quite well.  Many families of gay people disown the person when he/she comes out of the closet.  Many have very bitter, angry feelings that they hold on to for years.  I have been treated very well by nearly all in my family.  As far as I know, there are only one or two who may have very bitter feelings.  I'm not even making a commentary about my family in particular, I'm only using my family as an example to illustrate in general the feelings a gay person has.

When I got engaged to Conrad, I wasn't sure exactly how or when to tell my family.  While I was in Utah this last May, I told only a few people in person, and then I posted it on Facebook.  The people I told in person responded with "Oh." or silence.  On Facebook, of my entire family (which, believe me, is rather big) two cousins congratulated me.  I got a "really?" and nothing else from family.  I had lots of congratulations from friends.  And I'm very happy to be engaged.  I definitely have no regrets there.  But, I hope you can understand how deflating it might be to have not one member of your immediate family congratulate you on something that you personally are so excited about.

Contrast that with just about any engagement announcement of a straight couple.  Or, when a married couple announces their anniversary, and are congratulated for being together for so many years.  It's very easy for a gay person to feel left out.  Imagine if you announce your engagement (to someone of the opposite sex) online or in person and all you got from your family was "Oh" or "really?".  How would you feel?  I love my family very much and how they treat me really matters to me.

I have a very sweet sister who had her children color pictures and send them to us.  Each child addressed them to "Keith and Conrad" and that meant the world to me.  My mother has emailed Conrad and spoken with him on the phone a couple times.  I'm not sure how much that meant to him, but it meant a lot to me.

Aside from that, no one else in my family has even acknowledged that I'm in a relationship.  No one has asked me what Conrad's like, how we met, what our wedding plans are, or anything that I would expect them to be asking if I were engaged to a woman.  Think how that would be for yourself.  When you're engaged to that special someone that you really love and are so excited to marry--(almost) everyone in your family pretends like nothing has happened.  For all you know, they think you're still single.

I know I'll have fun planning the wedding, and it will be a wonderful time for both of us, regardless of who's there to share it with us.  It would be very nice to have family there, to have them celebrate the day with us.  But, whether they're there or not, I will be happy that I'm marrying the man of my dreams.

I've thought about this a lot, really.  As for me personally, Conrad brings me so much happiness that it easily outweighs any sorrow I might feel over my family's non-acceptance (or at least, my perception of such).  But, the conclusion that I always arrive at is that if dogmatic obedience to your church outweighs the feelings of your loved ones--the opportunity to rejoice with them when they are happy in life--then, what is the purpose of your religion?  If you cannot share the joyous moments in life with those that matter the most to you, then what good does your religion do you?  Even if it is true, and you can be with your family forever, is it worth it if it makes you miss out on the good times in their lives?  And is it worth making your gay family members feel unworthy of your praise and congratulatory expressions?

Comments

  1. It may just be the uncomfortableness (sp?) of it all. Not quite knowing what is the etiquette for something like this-- if your family is pretty open and involved with each other it may just be something that will turn to normal once the reality of it all settles in. I have been getting Christmas cards this year and they all say: Merry Christmas to me, the babe and the kids. Of course some of this probably wouldn't have happened had I not put his name on the cards.

    What about Conrad's family? What's their reaction?

    Hugs,Miguel

    ReplyDelete
  2. See, Miguel, it's not really about my family. I'm sure all the things you've said here are correct. And, in fact, I've even said some of those very things about my family in previous posts. (I don't remember which at the moment, but I can look that up if you like.) I'm sure that my family--in particular--just needs a bit more time, and perhaps even to meet Conrad in person.

    The main point of the post is to comment on society in general--particularly on religious households. From my dealings with other gays (particularly other MoHos), the family reaction is somewhere around this norm, ranging from complete acceptance (which is very rare) all the way to complete disownment (also rare, but probably more common than acceptance). From what I have heard from other people, my family's reaction is just slightly toward the "accepting" side of the "average" response from family.

    So, the commentary is on society in general. To get the average non-gay reader to think about how they treat their gay friends and what impact those actions have on them. Straight people often take for granted things like being congratulated for getting engaged or married, so they don't appreciate how deeply that can hurt a gay person when they have no such congratulations. I merely used my own family as an example to illustrate how gays are often treated, not to criticize anyone in my family or my family as a whole.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Anyone is allowed to comment on this blog. As you can tell from reading my blog, I am very opinionated and I'm not afraid to share my opinion. You're welcome to disagree with me as mildly or vehemently as you like, but be aware that I will reply with my own opinions, very strongly. If you don't want that kind of open discussion, or you think it will hurt your feelings, then please avoid posting. I do try to be respectful, but my verbology often comes across as brusque.

Popular posts from this blog

Do you really believe?

This is Richard Dawkin's talk from yesterday's Reason Rally in Washington DC.  He makes several good points, but the one that stuck out to me the most was when he told people that they should challenge someone when they say they're religious.  The example he gave is when someone says they're Catholic, ask them if they really  believe that when a priest blesses a wafer that it actually turns into the body of Christ, or that the wine actually turns into his blood.  So, this post will be dedicated to me asking any of my reader base who are religious, do you really  believe what your religions teach? For those who are Christian (any denomination thereof), Do you really believe every word of the Bible to be the word of god?  If so, read every word of the Bible and then come back and answer the question again. Do you really believe that a snake tricked Eve into eating fruit that made her suddenly unfit to live in the paradisiacal garden god had just made for her? Do y

Hitchens v god

I'm rather ashamed to admit that I just recently discovered Christopher Hitchens. And, while I normally add my own thoughts and commentary to videos when I post them here, in nearly every Hitchens video that I've encountered, I have not a single word to add. He is so articulate and does such a good job of presenting his case that I couldn't possibly add anything to it.  I would definitely be interested if any of my readers have any comments to make in regards to what Hitches says in this video. Enjoy.  

The fundamental theorem of atheism

I think many times, with all the discussion of religion, science, atheism, etc, it can be easy to lose sight of the real purpose of what one is trying to accomplish.  Of course, this can happen in any discussion.  But, one of those ever-famous text-images found on Facebook caught my attention today.  (I do think it's funny, but from what I have seen a basic fact about human psychology, that people are more likely to read text when it is in an image--even if the image is purely text--than when it is just simply written text.  I wonder if they've done any studies on that.) So, to bring my own focus back to where it should be, here is what I will call the "fundamental theorem of atheism".  Yes, that's a very mathematical title--every branch (and sub-branch) of mathematics has a "fundamental theorem".  So, here it is for atheism.   The burden of proof lies on those who claim that there is a god to produce evidence of its existence .  So, here's the ima