Skip to main content

Double double standard standard

This post was inspired by a conversation that I overheard at school today.  These two guys were chatting with each other (no women were present) and one remarked that he enjoyed walking up a staircase behind a woman with an attractive tail end (I'm paraphrasing to keep the post at least PG).  The other guy voiced his assent.  The conversation varied through many topics completely unrelated to women and their attractiveness, but multiple times throughout the one man would make interjections concerning his obsession with viewing attractive females.

This is not the first time I have witnessed/been involved in such a conversation.  It really is what straight men think about for a great portion of their time.  It's not even just the "vulgar", "profane", or "ungodly" men either.  When I was in the MTC, the 7 other missionaries in my district (that I was with nearly every waking hour of the day every day) also frequently discussed the topic as well.  They would rate women (since it'st he MTC, that would mean mostly just sister missionaries) as they walked past.  They'd do so in Japanese--possibly to avoid being overheard, who knows.  At any rate, I have heard religious men and men who do not actively participate in any religion discuss women's bodies--sometimes as if they are just objects to satisfy the man's own desires.

Our society not only supports such actions and discussions, but it encourages them.  Television and Internet commercials will use attractive women to sell their products, knowing that straight men will be enticed by such visuals.  We have game shows where a man will pick which woman he wants to date/marry based on her looks.  I won't even go into pornography, but that's another example.  Anyway, expressions of attraction toward the female body are encouraged and exploited in so many ways.

What I wish to point out is the striking double standard that exists in our society.  Men speak about women in such ways, and some women even tolerate it, but any hint of homosexuality is not only discouraged but also insulted and mocked.  I was watching a movie with some friends and at one point one man kissed another.  One of the people watching with me expressed his disgust at having to be exposed to this.  Well, I feel the same way when I hear men talking about women the way they do.  I feel the same way when I'm surfing the web reading a news article and I have to see some woman with enlarged breasts trying to sell me something.

Why is it that we tolerate such objectification of the female body but as soon as a man gives even the slightest hint that he likes another man, horror and disgust are the response?  I mean, consider what would have happened in the situation I described above if I had voiced my feelings.  That man who was talking about how fun it was to stare at particular parts of a woman's body, what would he have said or done if I told him that I liked staring at parts of his body?  He probably would have punched me in the face, called me names, or at the very least been disgusted.  My first question is, if you don't like people talking about your body, then why do you talk about other people's bodies?  My second question is, why am I--as a gay man--not even allowed to hold hands with the man I love without making people upset when all of the straight couples are allowed to do much much more in public?  A straight couple can make out on TV or a movie and no one complains.  But as soon as it's a gay couple, all the straight people in the room feel like vomiting.

I think there should be one standard for all people.  If holding hands is an acceptable public display of affection, then it should be appropriate for gay couples and straight couples alike.  If making out in a movie is appropriate for straight couples, then it should be equally appropriate for gay couples to make out in a movie.  Also, if you want to make comments about how you think certain parts of other people's bodies are attractive, then you shouldn't be uncomfortable with other people doing the same thing to you--whether they're of the same or the opposite sex.  I don't think it's ever a good idea to objectify people--whether they're male or female--but I don't see anything wrong with admiring someone whom you feel is attractive.  Yes, I understand that it's inappropriate to make explicit comments to a person about their body, since such attention is rarely wanted.  But, I'm not talking about that.  If I were even to say something as innocent as "I think you're cute" (which would be very appropriate for a guy to say to a girl) to another guy, the chances are that he would not take it as a compliment and would be offended.

So, basically, I think there are two groups of people that are being oppressed by the way our society has developed.  The first group is women, since they are made to be sexual objects to cater to the desires of men--selling things on commercials and selling their bodies as pornography or prostitutes.   Yes, it's true that when a woman decides to sell her body in one of these ways, she's doing it of her own will and if she really didn't want to do it she could do something else.  But the problem is that when she appears on TV and sells that beer using her attractive body in very little clothing, she's projecting that image onto all women in society, encouraging men to continue to believe their natural instinct, which is that women should exist for men to look at them.

The second group is gay people--male and female alike--since we are not allowed to express our emotions or their affections with each other or to straight people. I know several gay people who afraid to show any affection at all in public, unless it's in a gay club or only gay people are around.  I know of other stories where gay couples have shown affection in public and have been mocked or harassed.  This is completely unacceptable.  Certainly, there is a line of decency--people should not be engaging in intercourse in public--but, holding hands and kissing are widely accepted as appropriate public displays of affection for straight couples, so I think they should be acceptable for gay couples as well.

Popular posts from this blog

What's a gainer?

If you haven't already done so, I would suggest reading my previous post before reading this one.  It's sort of an introduction and gives the motivation.  Also, by way of disclosure, this post is not sexually explicit but it does touch on the topic of sexuality and how that relates to the subject at hand.

So, what is a gainer?  I'll relate, as best I can, the experiences I have gone through myself to help answer the question.  I remember when I was a young boy--perhaps around 6 or 7--I would have various fantasies.  Not sexual fantasies, just daydreaming about hypothetical situations that I thought were interesting or entertaining.  I had many different fantasies.  Sometimes I would fantasize about becoming very muscular, sometimes about becoming very fat.  
These fantasies varied in degree of magnitude and the subject of the fantasy.  Sometimes I myself would change weight--I would become muscular or fat.  Other times, I would do something to make other people fat or musc…

Karing about others

Mostly because I have been thinking about her lately, I feel compelled to write about someone who was very dear to me.  Many people who have met me in the last several years may not be aware of the fact that I was married to a woman for 3 years. I understand there can be lots of confusion whenever I mention it, and misunderstandings or misconceptions might occur. So I would like to take this opportunity to discuss my feelings about her.

Shortly after I came out, I attended a party for ex-Mormon gay people. Many of them had been married (to someone of the opposite sex), as I had. Most of those marriages had ended in divorce. Sometimes the divorce was very ugly, other times it was rather pleasant and they remained friends throughout the process. I assume it is because of the ugly divorce scenarios that this statement was made to me. Upon revealing that I had previously been married to a woman and that the marriage had ended in her death, a man said to me that it was good that it had end…

The scientific method vs the religious method

I find it interesting when people cite the fact that science keeps changing as a reason to disbelieve it and to believe instead in the "eternal" doctrines taught by some church or other.  Let's examine why science keeps changing.  Here's the scientific method.

Develop a hypothesis (this means "have a belief").Design an experiment to test the hypothesis.Conduct the experiment.Determine whether the hypothesis is believable based on the results of the experiment. This is why science keeps changing--because people notice flaws in it and correct them.  People once thought the solar system was geocentric, but now know that it's heliocentric.  How did this happen?  By using the scientific method.  Scientists are willing to admit that they're wrong.  They're willing to give up a bad idea when they see evidence that it makes no sense.  Contrast this with the religious method (simplified version). Have a belief.Look for evidence to support that belief.Ignor…